The Value Of The Napster Brand
from the won't-last-long-at-this-rate dept
I made fun of Roxio for buying the Napster name, suggesting that by the time they got it back running, not too many people would care that it was called Napster. As I said at the time, I'm sure the initial name recognition will cause a lot of people to check out the new Napster, but once they realized it wasn't very good (or anything like the old Napster), the name wouldn't go very far. Now, the NY Times is releasing some more details on Napster 2.0, and it includes one interesting tidbit about the brand. In a study in early 2002 about what file sharing applications people use, a bunch of folks said "Napster" - which was impossible, because the service had gone offline six months earlier. So, apparently, the brand had at least some staying power as a "generic" name for file sharing. Of course, that was over a year ago already and the details suggest the new system is (once again) not about music sharing, but about music downloading. It's also going to have lots of annoying restrictions on what you can do with your music, which is exactly the thing consumers have made it clear they don't want. What's funny is that each time the music industry launches another "legitimate" music downloading service they creep one tiny step closer to what people want. It would be great if they just realized that eventually they're going to have to go all the way, so they might as well give up wasting their time on half-assed efforts and offer a real file sharing service.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
