If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
- Wireless Industry Now Claims 5G Will Miraculously Help Fix Climate Change
- New Bill Claims To Ban 'Surveillance Advertising,' But Doesn't Actually Do It
- Airline CEOs Freak Out Over 5G Despite Limited Evidence Of Real World Harm
- Senator Blumenthal Blames TikTok... Due To A Popular And Widely Championed Science Experiment Gone Wrong
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
That's pretty determined optimism...
2) Internet access at a public school terminal or in a community centre is not comparable to Internet access at your convenience at home.
3) Digital divide isn't mainly a race question - it's an income and education issue - "When he controlled for education and income, he found that broadband had been deployed more rapidly in minority areas than in white neighborhoods over the past two years." Sure - but if minorities are predominantly poorer and less educated the effect is the same.
4) They correctly identify that 42% of Americans don't go online but state (without showing any statistical evidence) that "the divide that does exist between the Web and non-Web proficient is no longer defined simply by income, gender, race, or education." Well, not simply by those factors - but they are still factors. The key factor they miss is that choosing not to be interested in the Internet is probably itself a choice linked to lower education.
Take a look at this table and you can see clearly that all kinds of divides still exist.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Can't Read or Write, but have internet!
[ link to this | view in thread ]