File Swapper Files Lawsuit Against RIAA
from the no-chance-to-refute dept
Following up on our earlier story, a file-sharer whose information was subpoenaed by the RIAA is fighting back and suing the RIAA for violating her privacy. It sounds like the woman (and her lawyers) have changed the focus of the lawsuit. While originally they were claiming that the RIAA didn't have enough proof to show that she, specifically, distributed the file - now they're taking the more conventional route of saying that the subpoena is a violation of privacy, since she wasn't given any chance to contest the release of her private information. The lawyers in the case point out that other subpoenas for personal information, such as in libel cases, allow the person in question to contest the request for the information - and therefore, claim that the RIAA's subpoenas are not valid. This is, of course, similar to the claims Pacbell and various universities are making.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
Other than that, I have little sympathy for mass infringers who provide a few gigs of their favorite songs (which they never bought) to a few million of their favorite friends (whom they've never met).
I want reasonable, sane, limited times on copyrights, and inherent fair use and sharing rights within a small personal circle.
Today, people don't honor copyrights, in part because they are now in direct contact with millions of strangers, and in part because they have no grasp or benefit of the Public Domain bargain anymore. I think the price of music is a smaller factor than many may opine: if you know ten real friends, you have a pretty good pool of music you can share back and forth.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
Opening a standardized public network port with no authentication IS distribution, just as putting a newspaper into a public vending machine IS distribution, whether someone grabs a copy or not.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Careful what you ask for...
Remember the 6 degrees thing?
Well, All it takes running multiple instances of something like WASTE to generated a fully connected, easily searchable mesh. Worse yet when your friends can push stuff to you.
So, just remember... the P2P stuff that you rue now may actually be the business model that you wish you accepted later.
BTW, my lastest musical discovery is that I actually like re-mixes far better than the originals... and that's *really* bad news for the record companies and their "artists". It all started with the NIN vs Spice remix... and once I realized that the keyword "remix" opened up a door to an entirely seperate world of music that I would never hear on the Radio or be able to buy in the store... well, I kind of gave up on the record companeies.
[ link to this | view in thread ]