Blocker RFID Tags Solve The RFID Privacy Problem

from the solutions-to-the-privacy-problem? dept

Someone who prefers to remain anonymous sent in a link to a story about how RSA is working on special RFID "blocker" tags. Just like regular RFID tags, except that they broadcast every possible RFID number, making it impossible to figure out what specific RFID tags are available. Now, despite the counter-productive spamming from a misguided anti-RFID type around here yesterday, there are certainly issues that should be discussed surrounding RFID and privacy issues. However, instead of just complaining about it, it's good to see companies working on technology solutions to the problem. The article isn't entirely clear, but it appears the system works by letting the owner of the blocker RFID tag easily select which RFID tags around them can be read at any particular point. This way, you get the benefit of using RFID tags without having to worry about how they're being used outside of their intended purposes. Also, if I understand this idea correctly, any individual would just need a single "blocker" RFID tag, and could then control every other RFID tag. This is smart. Earlier solutions to the RFID privacy problem were proposals for new reprogrammable RFID tags that would let users turn them off. However, that would be expensive and there's no guarantee that all manufacturers would use those RFID tags, as opposed to the cheaper, non-reprogrammable ones. This solution avoids all of that with a fairly simple, inexpensive solution.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    dorpus, 26 Aug 2003 @ 9:35pm

    Correct me if I'm wrong but...

    Aren't tags easier to peel off than stickers? What would prevent a customer from switching RFID tags for a cheaper product?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    Mike (profile), 26 Aug 2003 @ 10:55pm

    Re: Correct me if I'm wrong but...

    Ok... you're wrong. The tags can be tiny... to the point where it will be almost impossible to determine where they actually are: http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/337/1/1/

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    dorpus, 27 Aug 2003 @ 12:47am

    Re: Correct me if I'm wrong but...

    Oh wow, reminds me of fleas. I wonder if you could attach those things to the back of fleas and turn a clothing store into a flea circus, so to speak?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous Killjoy, 27 Aug 2003 @ 6:59am

    Re: Correct me if I'm wrong but...

    Thought this was a great idea too, but if a single RFID jammer creates a total zone of RFID unreadability within even a limited range, this could really kill a lot of useful applications before they get off the ground.

    Case in point - a suite in an RFID-enabled hospital with prescriptions, key equipment and even surgical dressings tagged for integration, tracking, and/or conditional alerts rendered useless by someone with an RFID Jammer on his keychain visiting a patient.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    George Orwell, 27 Aug 2003 @ 8:43am

    RFID technology = George Orwell's 1984

    For further information on this highly invasive technology and why we should actively boycott it please point your browsers to:
    www.nocards.org
    or www.boycottgillette.com

    ... and THANK YOU Mike for pointing this article out to those of us that are actively concerned about our privacy !

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. icon
    Mike (profile), 27 Aug 2003 @ 9:10am

    Re: RFID technology = George Orwell's 1984

    Please refrain from spamming our message boards like you did the other day. It doesn't make any one more likely to agree with you. It actually makes me LESS likely to agree with you, because it makes you look like a quack.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Reincarnated as a duck ..., 27 Aug 2003 @ 9:16am

    Re: RFID technology = George Orwell's 1984

    Point well made and accepted.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Aug 2003 @ 12:35pm

    Lawers always trump engineers.

    It won't take long for blockers to be outlawed.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    TridefullyClear, 15 Apr 2010 @ 9:09am

    Why Jam when you could "accidentally" destroy?

    take the "PMP" concept and make it an "EMP"

    Just do only good and don't get caught.

    Only outlaws will have liberty.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.