Webcasters Sue RIAA For Monopoly Actions

from the isn't-that-obvious dept

As they've been threatening to do for months, a group of small webcasters has sued the RIAA for acting as a monopoly and trying to push them offline with the webcasting royalty rates they set. The group claims that the negotiated rates were done by a small group of webcasters who had no right to represent the other webcasters. No matter where you stand on webcasting royalty rates, this might be a tough case to prove. The question is at what point does the RIAA have to stop? Do they need to individually negotiate with every webcaster who doesn't accept current royalty plans?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Precision Blogger, 28 Aug 2003 @ 6:57am

    This Suit has merit

    I read the decision in which the judge set the rates that could be charged for webcasting. The judge reviewed the RIAA's prior actions and found it had done many things to artifically boost rates paid before the decision, often in "sweetheart" contracts. Most of the prior webcasting contracts were thrown out of consideration, and the judge used a very few used as "Experience" to set the current rates.

    In this instance, the RIAA is acting as a partially regulated monopoly. The rates have clearly NOT been set in any way that would encourage webcasting. Many stations dropped their web broadcasting as the rates were set; if the RIAA were trying to control a real market, they would immeidately have worked to set rates that brought many of these players back in to the business.

    If successful, the new suit would not force the RIAA to make many negotiations, but rather to set rates that are competitive, instead of punitive.

    - The Precision Blogger
    http://precision-blogging.blogspot.com

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.