Consumers Getting Pissed Off Over Hidden Calling Plan Fees
from the bad-news dept
I use MCI's "The Neighborhood" flat-rate plan for my home phone line. When I first called them to sign up, I told them I knew there would be extra fees, but I wanted them to detail out each and every fee, so I knew the total price I would be paying (this way I could judge if it was worth it compared to my current phone bill). The woman I spoke to obliged, and listed out each fee, until the bill ended up at $57.42 - slightly less than my usual bill. I signed up. The first bill came and it was slightly over $64. They included a random extra $5 charge (which I got them to remove) and then told me that the fees the original operator had told me about - and which I had based my decision on - could not have been explained to me. They said that the woman I spoke to had simply made them up, and that they couldn't guarantee what the fees would be each month. Since then, every month, the fees have crept up, so I'm now paying over $62/month for the service that is still listed at a flat-rate of $49 - and which was promised to me at $57.42. When SBC called me to offer a similar plan, I asked them to detail the extra fees, and I was told there were none whatsoever - which is simply not true. It appears that I'm not the only person getting fed up with these fees. The NY Times has found that many consumers are increasingly angry about being lied to in advertised rates and "fake" fees that aren't "fees" at all, but simply the cost of doing business for the company. As it stands, in my case, all MCI has done is created a very disloyal customer, who is constantly looking for a better deal. Unfortunately, right now, I haven't been able to find one - since all the other phone companies are pulling the same scam. VoIP plans like Vonage are increasingly looking appealing, but so far still have a few problems that I don't want to bother with (such as not working if the cable modem goes down - which it does constantly). The phone companies claim they need to do this to stay competitive, but I'd be willing to pay a fair price for a company that was honest and treated me right. Maybe I'm the only one.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Truth in advertising...
Seems to me what should happen is an FTC or SEC audit on the phone companies for Truth in Advertising, since everyone else has to live by those rules. Why did best buy and some other retailers lose for exactly the same advertising when they weren't including the rebate information in the price of items they were selling?
Now-a-days, if a company is pricing a product to be $239, and you go into the store and find out that the price is really $289 with a $50 mail-in-rebate, the company could be shut down because they were incorrectly advertising their products. Thus, Best Buy et. al. have to specifically state the price, and then print the reductions in that price because of rebates, in order to keep from getting in trouble.
How come the phone companies don't have to live by the same rules? Just because they have a quasi-monopoly doesn't mean that they should be protected, in many ways they should be much more rigerously enforced than the other vendors because they have a reason to deceive users.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
phone bills
I don't know how it works in the other companies, but we've had people fired for not disclosing all of the costs we know of. Believe it or not, the majority of our people actually try to be honest. The system is of pricing is just obscene. Every state is different. In some states, every locale is different.
If you're really interested, I'd be glad to give you a trasparent view from the front lines (seems like maybe the 'enemy' front lines?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
prepaid calling cards
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Taxes
The big thing that people seem to be missing here, is that most of these extra fees are TAXES. Federal, state, county, local - they've learned that one place they (the government) can slap on extra fees and people can't complain, is on phone bills. Customers blame the fees on the phone companies, not on the government! These taxes are also variable depending upon where you call, so we can't tell you for sure how much they are going to be. I'm not even able to use formulas for calculating these taxes - we have to send our data out to a tax calculation company, who then sends it to a regulatory compliance company, and so on.
On our invoices, we detail exactly who's getting the money, and let me assure you, it isn't us. There are even plenty of taxes we pay that we aren't allowed to "pass on to the consumer".
The one variable is the "Universal Service Fund" which should be about 8% - but companies are sometimes allowed to tack on extra fees there which are rationalized as "cost of collecting the tax". I disagree with adding these fees but my company does anyway.
That said, prepaid phone services are normally a rip-off compared to discount per-minute services. If you use less than the max amount, they make a killer profit - if you consistently use more than the max amount they find a way to charge you or cancel you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
Go with Vonage. You won't regret it. I've been using Vonage for almost a year now and even with my cable modem outages, it's been worth it. I pay $27 a month and have never used all my minutes. If the cable modem goes out, Vonage automatically forwards to my cell phone. They now have 911 dialing also (however no enhanced 911).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
Get BASIC service.
Buy prepaid long distance cards.
Problem solved.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You've been warned.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]