Symantec Wants To Outlaw Publishing Virus Information
from the want-to-keep-it-all-to-themselves dept
Among the strategies discussed at a Congressional session on how to prevent viruses and worms from becoming a growing problem (something that is only going to get worse), the head of anti-virus firm Symantec came up with a somewhat backwards solution. He says it should be illegal to post any information about how to create a virus or a worm. In other words, make information less available. It's a classic "security through obscurity" plan that can't work. Fighting these things takes information. Locking down information doesn't mean that it won't spread, but that it will be spread underground. Thus, we'll be less safe, because we won't be nearly as aware of what the threats are.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Knowledge is Power
I have the right to know what could infect my computer , just as I have the right to enlighten myself about cancer, aids or a myriad of other afflictions.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nobody gets it?
They want to ban 'how to make' virus information.
A subtle difference, but a difference none the less...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Knowledge is Power
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Nobody gets it?
Or is it that they want to ban "how to make" virus information so that new competitors will not be able to have the same resources they had.
I think this is a very powerful anti-trust move on the part of Symantec. All they are going to do is make it difficult for anyone legitimately wanting the information since the once who are writing the viruses already have it or at least know where to get it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I guess every company is the same.
Is there *any* company out there being run by people with the RIGHT balance of business sense, common sense, and technical understanding?
... and are they looking for a Perl hacker? :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I guess every company is the same.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The redundant law of redundancies
It's also quite illegal to publish viruses, though people seem confused as to if this means just the source code or releasing the complied code into the wild. There have been a few cases where "researchers" code accidently escaped into the wild. I believe the granddaddy of them all, the Morris worm, fell into this catagory.
I can tell you this: I was around during the Morris worm and if it had not been for independant technical analysis by univerity admins. people would have been lost. Remember, this was back when the FProt folks were the only anti-virus game in town and computer viruses/worms were considered an esoteric research topic of limit value in real life.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Constitution
Sorry, but if John Q. Public wants to tell the world how to make a virus, he has that right.
If someone doesn't like that right, they do have the right to LEAVE.
[ link to this | view in thread ]