Apple Sues Apple
from the whoops dept
Whenever people complain about the incompleteness of Apple's iTunes music download store, they inevitably mention that songs by The Beatles are missing. Well, here's one reason that might be happening: The Beatles apparently own a company called Apple Corp. that, for many years, has had legal battles with Apple Computers. When the company first came about The Beatles sued them over the name, and Apple ended up licensing it and promising to stay out of the music business. A few years later, when Apple dared to introduce a computer that had speakers and could play music, The Beatles/Apple accused them of breaking the agreement, and Apple had to pay up a settlement fee. Now, with the iPod and iTunes, it seems clear that Apple Computers has gone well past the original agreement and The Beatles are now suing Steve Jobs (or Apple is suing Apple, if you'd like). Of course, the whole point of trademark law is that you don't confuse the brands. I'm not sure how many people are going to confuse the Beatles with Apple Computers.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Beatles...blech....
The Beatles' time has come and gone. I cannot stand their music, and see them as the Britney Spears boy band of the 50s-60s. There may be three or four songs in their entire collection I'd be interested in (and I already have them, and more, which I legally purchased years ago.)
I hope Apple Computers wins, so we can move on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Beatles...blech....
Violating the terms of a settlement makes Steve Jobs no better than the way Mirosoft does business.
(Consider that the last beatles album made number 1....20 years after the band broke up, that is far better than the value of the IP Apple's created)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't see a problem with this.
Apple was a computer company, and back in those days you made music by hand coding a series of frequencies to feed to a buzzer element to produce a series of flat notes that could vaguely be described as music-like.
It would have been impossible at the time for them to imagine a time you could carry around a cigarette-pack sized box with more computing power than the biggest mainframe computers at the time and have it hold so much music.
I'm sure when the lawyers said "and by signing this agreement you agree to not become a music publishing company" and Steve Jobs thought "yeah, like that's ever going to happen".
Apparently the lawyers at Apple forgot about that little agreement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I don't see a problem with this.
I think I disagree with that. I think the founders of Apple Computers had extremely fertile imaginations. I think they certainly imagined small powerful computers. To say it is impossible that they imagined these involved music is rather on shaky ground, I believe.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stop fighting, you two fruits!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
it is confusing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]