Female Robots Are Coming
from the robotic-discrimination? dept
Roland Piquepaille writes "According to the Sydney Morning Herald, Peter Hill, of the Australian robotic company Kadence Photonics, has reprogrammed robots to give them some "feminine" intuition. As wrote the author, "a robot that thinks like your mum may be running your kitchen and home sooner than you think." Peter Hill's new method of programming robots [is] based on co-operation rather than exploitation. These reprogrammed robots, Michelle, Romy and Goldie, "are able to switch between a number of jobs according to priority and circumstance." "If a man does the housework, he'll load the washing machine then stand there and watch it," Dr Hill said. "A woman will go off and do something else." Check my blog for excerpts from the article." Anyone else think this is a bit sexist? Why is it that it should be "female" robots running your kitchen and home? Next thing you know, we're going to find out that female robots make less money than comparable "male" robots...Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
Er... not really the point. It wasn't that anything "bad" was said about women. It was just that the assumption was that it was more "female" to clean the house and take care of the kitchen. Making that assumption (not value statement) seems sexist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Non Issue
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Choice == free will
...oh my god, it's alive!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
"If a man does the housework, he'll load the washing machine then stand there and watch it,"
Have any of you ever done this? Do you know anyone whose done this? It's like saying that "Men will paint something, and then stand there and watch it dry".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I have painted however and no, I don't stand to watch the paint dry. I think generally-speaking that men make better painters and women probably do a better job with laundry.
My 2.5 cents' worth...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]