File-Sharers Get Angry... With Kazaa
from the nice-try dept
It's no surprise that those accused of file sharing by the RIAA are angry. However, the latest tactic is not to be angry with the RIAA or themselves for doing something illegal. Instead, they're trying to pin the blame on Kazaa for making file sharing so easy. They're claiming (not very convincingly) that they figured it must be legal since it was so easy. This sort of outrage is misdirected, but expected. It's no secret that I think the music industry should embrace file sharing and not sue its own customers, however, I don't deny that these people broke the law and should take responsibility for what they've done. Blaming Kazaa isn't the answer, and only makes it more likely that politicians will feel compelled to say that the technology itself is illegal. As the article points out people know better than to blame Xerox when someone photocopies a book.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
Is America a country of victims?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
Just look at all the law suits out there and tell me it isn't. "Woman sues McDonalds because she spilled hot coffee on herself" is a perfect example. Another is "Two boys shoot passing cars and claim they were acting out a part of the game Grand Theft Auto".
It's easy to blame something else.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bong's are Legal too ...
My Bong is @ fault for why I smoke pot.
Really !
I figured since I can buy bong's legally there is no reason I can't smoke weed out of it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Bong's are Legal too ...
That argument is no longer valid. Just ask Tommy Chong.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Bong's are Legal too ...
I just buy my pipes @ head shops located along the Atlantic beach ...
Of course all their signs say: " For the smoking of tobacco purposes only "
( grin )
[ link to this | view in thread ]
news...
In other news, water is wet. A shocking discovery.
Thank god we live in the land of the free! Where I did all this bad stuff because of a corporation, booze, credit cards who make it easy to gamble...not my fault. Yessiree, we are soooo free! I was forced to do this..its not my fault.
*sigh* I thought I had seen it all but THIS is just stupid.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
Look into the case a bit more. You'll find that it's about a LOT more than just "spilling coffee" and a lot more about the complete indifference that McDonald's had towards the victim.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
I don't drink coffee, but I sure as hell know that it's to be served hot. I have yet to see a McDonalds in the US selling Iced coffee (although I will say I did see it in Europe when travelling there a few years ago).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]