Are We All Destined To Lose Our Jobs To Machines?
from the simplifying-things-a-bit-too-much dept
Combining a bunch of different concepts we've spoken about here, Salon is running an article looking at Marshall Brain's fear that robots are going to take over every imaginable job and leave us all with nothing to do all day. As we've discussed before, this is incredibly simplified and unlikely to happen. It reminds me of the whole "paperless office" concept - which has actually brought us to the point where we use more paper than ever before. All that automation does is free up the more tedious jobs, and opens up new opportunities for other, more fulfilling jobs. Brain, also, is hardly an unbiased party. He's trying to sell a novel on this idea - and is also trying to patent the idea of robotic workers. The article takes the example of the self-checkout counter (another topic we've discussed here a few times), and points out that most of the places that have installed them haven't let go any workers. Instead, they've been working on making the overall shopping experience more pleasant by actually putting people out there to help. It's really not that hard to figure this out. There are some things - usually personal service - that really just can't be automated in any reasonable way. The article also quotes a union guy who claims (incorrectly, I believe) that consumers are going to revolt against self-checkout machines and will demand humans. However, this is missing the point. These machines automate repetitive jobs. All the people who seem to be afraid about the loss of jobs on this issue seem to think so lowly of the people in these jobs to believe the only thing they can do is push the same button over and over again. I'd like to believe most people are capable of slightly more than that.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
job automation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I really hope it's true
More importantly: the "first world" countries have a pending demographic problem because of the pyramid-scheme pension systems: current workers pay for the pensions of current retirees. By 2050 there will be 1 retiree per four workers in the US; the situation is more dire in Europe and Japan. In addition there will be a huge shortage of workers. So anything that alleviates this problem is welcome.
His idea of the machine that tells the people what to do is very depressing though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
patenting robot workers?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: patenting robot workers?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
u say it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Too True
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
GROW UP!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]