Why Hollywood's Broadcast Flag Won't Work
from the because-it-makes-life-worse-for-consumers? dept
While there's been a lot of hype around the article earlier this week suggesting that Hollywood has made the right moves while the music industry has faltered concerning digital content, that still seems to be an exaggeration. Take the latest move by the movie industry to force a "broadcast flag" on digital TV signals. People are starting to point out why this is a terrible idea that will not succeed. It makes life worse for consumers while doing nothing to stop real infringement. The article quotes someone from Philips (clearly biased, but still makes good points) saying: the broadcast flag will "hurt consumers, impede innovation and be impossible to implement". He goes on to explain that it would require consumers to replace almost all of their consumer electronics (something you might think Philips would support), make the content they received less valuable, and would block new competitors from entering the consumer electronics market (again, something you would think Philips would support). The movie industry (and the music industry) still are of the belief that people should pay every single time a piece of content is seen or heard. Sooner or later, they're going to have to realize that not only is that impossible, but trying to enforce it is actually shrinking their own market.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The Meter is Running
The fact is that I only have so many dollars to spend on entertainment, so they are not going to increase the revenue they get from me. They will just push me to other lower-cost forms of entertainment.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Broadcast Flag
Or rewire the damned box.
Whom the gods would destroy, they first make give silly presentations about stupid ideas.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Who cares about broadcast flag?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
Their positionmakes more sense than you think. What would happen if every already-sold HDTV set had to be replaced to process DRM but not offer any new features? Well, there's two ways this can end up. One would be that whoever built it replaces it at a loss simply to keep you from being really pissed off, potentially blaming whoever made it. The other is that the customer gets shafted.
You know that it would be quite a competition. Most of the other consumer electronics companies, who *do* have a vested interest in promoting the broadcast flag, are going to offer incentives to their customers to soften the blow. Which means that Philips gets dragged along without seeing any financial benefit.
Being fast and loose with copyright, as long as it's not directly intended for piracy, is profitable business. Witness the dual-deck VCR and the CD copier. Or the VCR in general. I think the main reason why DRM is getting anywhere lately is mainly because Sony has their fingers in media-producing pots, and many of the other electronics companies have similar investments.
[ link to this | view in thread ]