If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Phoenix City Council Says PD Can Have Surveillance Drones Without Any Policy In Place Because Some Officers Recently Got Shot
- New Right To Repair Bill Targets Obnoxious Auto Industry Behavior
- Former Employees Say Mossad Members Dropped By NSO Officers To Run Off-The-Books Phone Hacks
- San Francisco Cops Are Running Rape Victims' DNA Through Criminal Databases Because What Even The Fuck
- Clearview Pitch Deck Says It's Aiming For A 100 Billion Image Database, Restarting Sales To The Private Sector
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The French Precedent
Our internet is based on American values that say:
1. Open (often rude) public debate is good
2. New frontiers should be conquered, through investing massive resources in it.
There are other cultures that view open debate as fanning the flames of hatred, so should be avoided. Still others believe that frontiers are a waste of resources, so should be ignored. There are plenty of countries with "frontiers" of vast deserts, swamps, or jungles, but people are not rushing to live there.
More concretely, the internet does pose plenty of problems for non-English speakers. There is an overbearing presence of English, along with all the English spam.
As far as my first-hand experience with MSN chats go, open public debate often serves to inflame relations between countries rather than improve them. When the ignorant rabble of one country talk to the ignorant rabble of another, they piss each other off and want to kill each other.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
What can you expect ?
[ link to this | view in thread ]