Can The DMCA Subpoena Provision Be Used For Good?

from the wrong-question dept

Jeremiah writes "Can my friend, being the rightful copyright owner of the musical works contained within his stolen PC, use the DMCA's provisions to independently subpoena MSN's connection records (to obtain the last known IP of his old PC) and the ISP's customer information to find out where his computer is and recover it?" Interesting story and potential use. For all the evil uses of the DMCA subpoena provision, is this a good one? I'm not a lawyer, so take my comments with that in mind. The DMCA's subpoena provision is supposed to be used by copyright holders to obtain information in a civil suit. The theft of the computer should be a criminal matter handled by the police - though, the police aren't always so interested. More to the point, if he really does want to use the DMCA to subpoena the information why not file a John Doe lawsuit and then subpoena the information? The problem isn't so much the subpoena itself - but that the subpoenas are issued prior to a lawsuit being filed and with little to no judicial oversight. Now, I'm sure some lawyers will come along and tell me I have no idea what I'm talking about. If you know more about the law than I do (lots of you, I'm sure) I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Zonker, 27 Sep 2003 @ 6:48am

    Interesting thought

    Actually, you wouldn't need to be a musician or whatever -- if you have any letters, artwork or any original creations saved to your hard drive, it would be a copyrighted work in the sense that you do own copyright over it -- even if it's not registered.
    It would be nice if there was at least one non-evil use of the DMCA...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    anonymouse, 27 Sep 2003 @ 1:17pm

    No Subject Given

    Wouldn't the musician need to have a claim of copyright infringement? Since the person who stole the computer hasn't done anything with the music contained on the computer, there doesn't look like any infringement has taken place. THat would leave it as a simple case of theft and not covered by the DMCA. But again IANAL.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.