Will Compulsory Licensing Change The Definition Of Music?
from the unintended-consequences dept
Over at LawMeme, they've been looking at some of the "unintended consequences" associated with any sort of "compulsory licensing" scheme to handle payments for digital music. The latest discussion points out that such a system could run into certain problems on the definition of music. The article starts out by mentioning such famous (or infamous, as the case may be) piece of "music" such as John Cage's famous 4 minutes and 33 seconds of silence called 4:33. Take that concept even further though, and you can turn any digitized file into an audio file. So, the writer wonders if shareware developers will suddenly take their software, turn it into an audio file, and start collecting their share of the compulsory licensing pot. Same with pornography providers. It certainly raises a lot of questions and points out the difficulty of trying to limit one type of data on the internet with some sort of artificial boundary.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
