eMusic Sold, Gives Up On Unlimited Downloads
from the make-life-worse-for-customers dept
I've been surprised that in all the various discussions about online music business models, very few people spoke about eMusic. They seemed to be about the only "major" online music service that actually offered MP3s without copy protection - and even offered up a nice unlimited download plan. Everyone I know who used eMusic said it was a wonderful way to find out about new artists, and to see what albums to buy and what concerts to attend. Not any more. Found over at Slashdot is this news that eMusic, after being sold, is changing the terms of their service from "unlimited" to "40 downloads/month". That's a pretty low cap if you're using eMusic to explore and find new songs. Next thing you know, they'll be saying that they're getting rid of the MP3 format in favor of some crippled copy protected format. Another situation where a company thinks that they can now charge people more for offering something that's less valuable.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Bye Bye eMusic
Shame I didn't get to know you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bye Bye eMusic
I am deeply torn as to whether to dump them or not - 40 downloads a month is way too low, but access to their catalogue is pretty worthwhile too. I ought to ditch them to show them a lesson in customer realtions (they have closed down their message boards...) but is it cutting off noses etc. Hard to say
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bye Bye eMusic
You can argue that the price is too high/downloads are too low, but it is hard to argue that it is wrong to charge. The flipside of compulsory licensing is that publishers are paid a regulated price of about $0.06 per song. If people downloaded more than 166 songs per month at $10, all of the money went to the publishers and none was left for the artist/label or EMusic.
I often see compulsory licensing talked about here as a potential good thing. This is the downside.
I can't vouch for all outcomes at EMusic, but the only reason that EMusic has a real business to set prices against is because it offers music in real MP3. None of the existing EMusic staff will work for EMusic if copy protection is implemented because that actually would kill the business.
I personally think the price is too high/download limits are too low, but I don't run the show there anymore. I would suspect that they will re-asses depending on how it impacts new customer sign ups and existing customer retentions. My guys who are still there have always been flexible and open to change.
-Gene
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bye Bye eMusic
And how is this a change from the Current CD infrastructure? After all, the labels charge $15-20 a CD, and the artists are lucky enough if they get $0.06 per song...
Unfortunately, the artists are screwed by compulsory licenses as much as they are screwed by the current RIAA-backed scheme. However, the ones I am now buying (since I stopped buying CDs from the majors,) are the ones in which the artist receives all or most of the profits, such as the ones sold directly from the artists' website by the artist or from CD-Baby or other independent labels who give a majority if not all of the profit to the artist (and most give "demo CDs" for new and up-in-coming bands, and allow you to download mp3s from their websites so that you can listen before you buy.)
Of course, this has also turned me on to new, better music such as Karl Denson's Tiny Universe, Govt Mule, Phish, etc.. So I guess it is better for me too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bye Bye eMusic
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bye Bye eMusic
Thank you emusic for the endless hours of browsing and downloading that have sparked the neophyte musicologist in me. Wish I'd discovered you two years sooner.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
http://www.allofmp3.com/index2.shtml?r=1881213382
[ link to this | view in chronology ]