Government Admits They Were Wrong In Whistleblowing Spammer Case
from the sorry-about-that dept
Back in August we wrote about the case of a guy who had been put in jail for discover a security hole at an ISP he had worked for and then spammed all their customers to tell them after the ISP didn't fix the hole. As we mentioned, spamming all the customers was not particular smart, but he wasn't charged with spamming. He was charged with "impairing the integrity" of a network, which is silly. He didn't impair the integrity of the network - he just pointed out where the hole was. Now, after the guy spent 18 months in jail, the government is finally admitting that (whoops) they made a mistake, and are asking the judge to "vacate" the felony conviction.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Vindication?
As I said back in August 2002, this whole situation is ridiculous (yes, I mis-spelled it then...), but very common. Though this was the first case I knew of where an individual was arrested and convicted of the crime of making other customers aware of a problem which the company failed to fix, I myself have been threatened by companies in the past for disclosing vulnerabilities in their hardware/software, and it seems to be a growing trend that instead of calling the security engineers, the first knee-jerk reaction to a vulnerability disclosure is to call the police. I hope that if any more of these cases are brought to trial, this will serve as case-law to prevent those accused from suffering the same misguided punishment that McDanel suffered.
Those who know me know that I have a deep, and sometimes perverted (yes, I know that word isn't right, but it is the closest word I can think of to describe what I am trying to say,) love for the law. And even with this love for the law, I still find this case to be disgusting since it in itself is the ultimate corruption of the law, using the legal system to protect a companies flawed image instead of dealing with the flaw and moving on. I just hope nobody else has to suffer this abuse of the law (I know, a daily occurance in many cases.)
[ link to this | view in thread ]