Swarthmore Shutting Down Websites That Link To Protest Site
from the going-waaaaaaaay-overboard dept
If you haven't been following the story of Swarthmore College and its actions to stifle students from protesting against Diebold, it's quite a story, that seems to only be getting worse. As you've probably read recently, there's been a ton of controversy over Diebold, one of the major makers of electronic voting machines. People have discovered huge gaping security holes that call into question certain recent elections. In that original article, we pointed out that Diebold seemed to be making quite a mistake in trying to shut down certain sites that included internal memos that admit the company knew of the security problems, and didn't really care. In claiming copyright ownership over those documents, and saying anyone posting them was in violation, they were admitting that they did own the documents, and therefore they were legitimate. Thus, under whistleblowing laws, it shouldn't be an issue that they were made public. However, Diebold has still been using the DMCA to force many sites offline. A group of students at Swarthmore college decided to start a little civil disobedience campaign to fight back against the cease-and-desist letter they received from Diebold, and will keep moving the documents from machine to machine to make sure they remain available. Now, here's where the story gets even more interesting. Ernest Miller has been following the case since then, and found out that Swarthmore College administrators have been siding entirely with Diebold on this one, and started disconnecting the internet accounts of any student who hosted the files. However, the latest news is the most shocking. Swarthmore is now disconnecting the internet accounts of anyone who dares to link to the site explaining the protest. This goes beyond cutting off internet access to those who host the files, and even those who link to the files. They're actually cutting off those who link to a discussion of why they're hosting the files. This is deeply troubling, both in seeing how a company is stifling information that absolutely should be public and in how a university is doing their best to stifle even the slightest discussion about this.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Takes all kinds
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Electronic Voting
New Diapold ad? "Want to be president? How about a senator or representative? Of course you do, bidding starts at $1.5 million. Please send check for $1.5 million to Diapold Industries, P.O. Box 99910, Oakland, CA, 95200."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Electronic Voting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Electronic Voting
How about we just have everyone raise their hands?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Electronic Voting
when these machines are finally in place, it won't be government by the people, for the people, but government by the corporation, for the corporation
While what's going on is a sorry state of affairs, I think you're jumping to a conclusion that's not supported (or even suggested) by the facts. Diebold is creating a system that's begging to be abused, but there's no reason to think that they themselves are the ones that will be the ones committing the abuse. In fact, Diebold has been so stupid through this whole affair that it's hard to believe they could do it all on their own.
What's really scary is to speculate about
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Obvious Solution...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]