Is The Atkins Diet Like Hacking Your Own Body?
from the I-want-my-carbs... dept
Last year, after finally buying myself a scale, I decided to lose some weight. In the course of about 4 or 5 months, I lost about 50 lbs, and got myself to somewhere around the weight I should be. The part that seems to shock everybody I speak to is this: I didn't do it by using one of those low-carb Atkins diets. I did it the old fashioned way: I ate less and exercised (a lot) more. Almost everyone I know, though, has turned to the Atkins method of losing weight, and everyone assumes that's the only way to lose weight these days. Within the geek community, it appears, the Atkins diet is especially popular - and many geeks compare it to hacking their own body. They have all sorts of analogies for why it's just like hacking, which is why so many gravitate towards it. I honestly don't care about whether or not one diet is better than another - or why some methods work for some people and other methods for other people. It's just interesting to think about the parallels between hacking your body and hacking a computer - even down to the idea that you're not really sure what's going to happen the system you're hacking. In the meantime, I'm just happy I get to keep eating bread.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Atkins and Evil Spirits
The NHF and its allies in the nutritional products industry also counterattacked those who criticized their policies.... Such blows included comparing [AMA committee members] Jarvis, Stephen Barrett, and Victor Herbert to Hitler, Goering, and Goebbels. Herbert told the Pepper subcommittee of an interview, appearing in an NHF publication, with Robert Atkins, formulator of a diet disparaged by scientific nutritionists [73]. Atkins had stated that Herbert "house[d] an evil spirit that needs to be exorcised." Soon thereafter Herbert had received death threats by mail and phone.
Also check out the Atkins diet debunked at
http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/lcd.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Atkins and Evil Spirits
Atkins may have been nuts, but his diet does work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
We have developped a sheep-like, non-critical thinking, lazy and irresponsible consumer society. I blame media and lawyers for this...so we blame everything but ourselves and we refuse to put in some effort to meet a goal (yes, this is a broad generalization but still true enough).
Yes...I'm fatter than I need to be....
BUT...I'm not fat because there's a sinister conspiracy by Big Food to make me so...I'm fat because I like to eat..and eat a lot. Period.
Atkins might make me lose weight...but only because I would be eating less (which belies the visions of eggs and bacon and steak for breakfast and stuff)...
The only lasting weight-loss possible is not by fad/hype diets...its by balanced, reasonable sized meals and exercise. Period.
(And when I'm done with being lazy, I'll get on that right away LOL)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yep. Put down the spoon.
I tried Atkins first; maybe it was too half-hearted, but it didn't do much if anything. Weight Watchers is good only because it makes it very explicit - X number of calories is all you need in a day, eat more, get *fat*. It's not rocket science.
I only went from 190 to 170. I have a friend my size who's 240. He *thought* he was eating right - cottage cheese in the morning. Small lunch of tuna. Reasonable supper. All that amounted to around a normal day's calories...but then it turns out that every night he walked down to the local store, and ate a candy bar and a Slurpee...which combined had almost as many calories as he ate for the rest of the day!!
One last thought - watch those calorie counter websites that tell you the minimum calories you need to eat in a day! According to one, I need 2,400 a day for "sedentary" lifestyle (hey, I sit all day.) But I know from counting if I eat that much, forget it! I'll gain a pound a week...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
The atkins thing is people who are generally looking to beat the system (ie eat less, exercise more) as is often the case with hackers.
I won't debunk the atkins thing as it does work, particularly for people who are grossly overweight. But much like hacking, it's something that most people can't stick with over the long run as your body creates it's own patches.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why Atkins is morse that being fat, from a health
Why? Because you have to rely on foods that lack carbs, which pretty much means you live on only eggs, meat and cheese and those artificial (aka fake food) bars stores sell.
The higher on the food chain you eat, the higher the concentration of pesticides there are, so meat is the ultimate pesticide sponge, and cheese isn't any better. So you are putting way too much stress on your kidneys and liver, expect them to fail at on early age.
The nutrients in meat aren't even health promoting. The type of iron in meat is the best food for cancer cells. Whereas the iron found in grain products cannot be easily used by cancer cells.
There are many more nutrients that exist in meat that are inferior to plant based. If you want to do the research you'll find all the examples, I wont bore you guys with all the details, I just wanted to wet your tongues.
While there may be more efficient ways to lose weight (ex: Weight Watchers) they're all based on the same idea. Work out, eat healthy. If anything doesn't rely on that method (ex: Atkins, absurd diet pills/drinks/diet bars) then expect it to have some serious (life threatening and permanent) side effects.
PS: I'm not a militant vegetarian or even a vegetarian myself. I just wanted to get the facts out there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good Job!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Atkins...
Years ago, before Atkins diet was the rave, most food service folks would look at her cross-eyed when she asked them to hold the bread on a hamburger, or hold the croutons on a salad. Now, it is common place, and she just has them to make it Atkins diet style.
I don't know whether it works or not, but it has saved my mom a lot of trouble.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A Researcher's Opinion
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
grains
[ link to this | view in chronology ]