BMG Happy With Results Of Copy Protected CD, More Coming
from the waste-of-cash dept
With all the hype surrounding BMG's release of Anthony Hamilton's CD with copy protection, it's no surprise that sales have done well. BMG is apparently so impressed that they're expanding the copy protection to other CDs. While they admit that they can't tell if it's because of the copy protection, they did notice that the usual sales drop-off for the Hamilton CD was much slower than with a typical CD. With most music releases, the first week is strong and then there's a huge drop off. The music industry believes that the amount of the drop off may indicate how much the music is being shared on file sharing networks (a very big assumption - and one that I doubt would be true). Besides, you just need the file to get up their once to make its way around - and Hamilton's CD showed up on file sharing networks before it was even released. I'd say a much more likely reason for the continued sales was all the press coverage about the copy protection scheme. More interesting, though, is that BMG says consumer backlash was much lower than expected, and most people didn't realize that the CD they bought was copy protected. Of course, it's interesting to see the music industry now going the reverse course of the movie industry on this particular topic. While the movie industry has copy protected their DVDs for years, they're now realizing it's a waste of money. I wonder if the pattern will be for plenty of new CDs to come out with (weak) copy protection that simply increases the costs (but does little to slow down file sharing), and then we'll hear some story about a record label ditching copy protection "to save money".
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Let 'em do it!!!
Even though I've pretty much "Boycotted RIAA", I still buy music from the indies (and I admit, I have purchased a few RIAA CDs, but only old stuff,) I'd still not buy the latest CD from an artist I like listening too if it is copy protected. If others don't mind buying CDs which restrict them from doing whatever they want with the CD, including playing it on a computer, or adding it to an MP3 Jukebox (for personal use,) then they are the demand that the BMG is supplying music for. If BMG doesn't have problems selling to this small subsection of the community, then that is not a problem for me. But if they expect everyone to buy their crap, and proceed to whine and complain when people choose not to buy their CDs, then I have a big problem with that (and I fear this will be the ultimate outcome of their "study", given their bad science in the past.)
You cannot turn your back on a majority of your customers, and then still expect them to buy your product. Any attempts to enforce them to is not Capitalism!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Let 'em do it!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Let 'em do it!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Let 'em do it!!!
I don't really think this baseless flame really needs a response, but for the sake of consistancy...
Maybe or maybe not, though I think you'll find just as many folks around here who can show that it works perfectly fine as those who don't. It may or may not work depeding on a lot of circumstances. It appears to work fine in a number of populations. I don't see Socialism, Facism, or Communism working too well in all circumstances either.
Just because someone is American, does not mean that they believe or practice capitalism. I am sorry, but I have a heard time believing that America practices true capitalism, as things like "copyright" or "patent" or "trademark" do not live in a true capitalistic environment (where monopolies are frowned upon because they aren't capitalistic.)
I am American, and considering the fact that a sneeze in the stock market in New York causes pneumonia in many other contries, I cannot see how being entirely deluded or knowing nothing about economics has anything to do with being American.
[ link to this | view in thread ]