The Anti-Spam Company Conflict

from the where's-the-incentive dept

You always have to wonder about businesses that are based on the premise that, if they're really successfully in what they do, you won't need them any more. That's certainly the case with anti-spam companies, who are apparently making pretty good money these days. While I'm sure that the vast majority of them do mean well, and plenty of their tools work very well in stamping out spam - you do have to wonder about their incentives to really stop spam. If spam were stopped, then these companies wouldn't have much of a reason for being in business any more. In other words, the more successful they are, the less successful they will be. That's a tough business proposition for any company.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Three Men In A Boat, 5 Nov 2003 @ 10:22am

    This is not new

    ... the more successful they are, the less successful they will be.

    This is also the case in many other businesses... doctors and car mechanics, for example. So this isn't really new, and people, as consumers, are either aware of this or not.

    In a free market system, consumers have a choice about which vendor to use, and it's up to them to be aware that they have a choice.

    Also, just like doctors and car mechanics, fixing one problem doesn't fix all problems. The spammers are crafty and are constantly tuning their "product". The anti-spammers then have to be craftier in response.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Beck, 5 Nov 2003 @ 10:26am

    No Subject Given

    Other companies that work under that business proposition manage to survive. Take for example the companies that make immunization drugs.

    These new anti-spam companies will likely diversify their product lines once the market for their product matures.

    Let's just hope they don't take after the volunteer firefighter who drummed up business for his department.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. icon
    Mike (profile), 5 Nov 2003 @ 10:41am

    Re: This is not new

    I never said it was new, but I do think it's quite different than doctors or car mechanics. Both those businesses are based on fixing things that break down, on the knowledge that older systems simply do breakdown.

    Spam is a problem that, if it's successfully blocked, the incentive for spamming goes away, and the problem goes away.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Chris, 5 Nov 2003 @ 11:41am

    Most do not try to solve the root problem

    Most anti-spam companies (by this I assume you mean companies that provide ant spam services) are not attempting to solve the spam problem by eliminating the spammers, or change the technology to reduce the ability to spam, or even to influence legislation cracking down on spammers. All that anti spam companies do is try to stem the tide at the recieving end.
    So if there is a change in the future that reduces or eliminates the ability of spammers to carry out their work (not likely in the sort term) perhaps the anti-spam companies will be in trouble.
    But really this is no different from other computer technologies. Look at the compainies that did CD burning. Or companies that did scanning of images or any number of other techniologies that were onces expensive and difficult but is now cheap/commonplace.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Precision Blogger, 5 Nov 2003 @ 4:21pm

    The March of Dimes had a Similar Problem

    The March of Dimes charity originally focused on obliterating Polio. When that actually happened (the Salk vaccine was developed in 1955), they scrambled to re-purpose the charity (of course they didn't use the awful word "re-purpose" in those days), to avoid becoming pointless.

    - The Precision Blogger
    http://precision-blogging.blogspot.com

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.