Profile Of Spamhaus' Steve Linford
from the fighting-spam-all-day-long dept
The NY Times is running a nice profile of Steve Linford from Spamhaus, describing how his operation works. Spamhaus, unlike many other anti-spam lists, is very open about their process and are quick to respond to mistakes. Because of all this, of course, Spamhaus is constantly attacked, both on the technology side and legal side - which Linford says only shows that his approach is working to piss of spammers. A number of spammers quoted in the article give the usual quotes about how they're "just trying to make a living" or that Linford doesn't know what he's talking about. However, time and time again, Linford and Spamhaus have the reputation for being right about the spammers they peg. The real issue, though, is how do you stop the spammers? They just keep going further underground, and as hard as people like Linford try to track them down, the more difficult they are to find.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Can't give up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
sender pays
Moving to a sender-pays email system is probably the only solution. Charging even just a penny per message/recipient would make almost all spam unprofitable. Most people probably send about the same amount of email that they receive, so their net cost would be close to zero. Mailing lists would have to start charging to recover the cost.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: sender pays
I suggest better way: break internet in zones...u have to pay to be in one of the zones...this is good old idea about localizing this gloabl thing...which of course defeets the purpose
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: sender pays
Ok, as you've thought this out:
1) Who will pay the bills of people on e-mail lists like amavisd, Freebsd.* debian.* linux.*? Some of these people make 100+ posts a day trying to help others. Now you want them to pay MORE money just so they can give 'the world' $0 software?
2) Who's collecting the money, verifying the sends?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I already PAY for email
[ link to this | view in chronology ]