Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

• 

  slim, 11 Nov 2003 @ 6:32am

  
  

  While we're at it ...

  Couldn't agree more with this statement:
  
  "Arresting a hacker or two isn't going to stop people from creating and releasing viruses and worms."
  
  In fact, all that money we spend on cops and security fences hasn't stopped burglaries either. What a ridiculous idea "police" are.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    alternatives, 11 Nov 2003 @ 7:41am

    
    

    Re: While we're at it ...

    In fact, all that money we spend on cops and security fences hasn't stopped burglaries either
    
    Locks keep honest people honest is all. All you can hope for is when you have PICTURES of the perp in a burglary is the cops don't say "Do you reconginize this person? No? Then how are we supposed to find them?" (That was the summary given to me by one of my clients about their break-in)
    
    The counter PR spin on the story is "Spamming and the tools spammers use has gotten so bad that Microsoft is offering bounties on the heads of the pro-spammer tools" (sobig is a spamming tool)
    
    

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  FreeWine, 11 Nov 2003 @ 8:11am

  
  

  Coercion in the commons

  "Arresting a hacker or two isn't going to stop people from creating and releasing viruses and worms."
  
  You also could say that execution isn't a cure for murder and jail isn't complete solution for theft. However, disincentives are the classic method this society uses to discourage anti-social behavior. The response is no less rational simply because Microsoft funds it.
  
  Of course, positive incentives are the other side of the coin. In the past, high salaries for people with high tech skills have served as a positive incentive to discourage wrecking the commons. I hope the recent trend of offshoring as many tech jobs as possible doesn't exacerbate the problem in the United States.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Makar, 11 Nov 2003 @ 11:08am

  
  

  No Subject Given

  RIAA approach works...why not try something like that? but you are right - to much PR!

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Kevin Murphy, 11 Nov 2003 @ 2:57pm

  
  

  No Subject Given

  "This was a publicity stunt, pure and simple."
  
  This suggests that if somebody turns in the MSBlast author then Microsoft will not cough up the cash.
  
  No?
  
  Then it was more than just a publicity stunt.
  

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Mike (profile), 11 Nov 2003 @ 3:31pm

    
    

    Re: No Subject Given

    Then it was more than just a publicity stunt.
    
    
    Publicity stunts can't cost money? The bounty was announced as a way to cut down on viruses and such. That seems unlikely to happen, though it did get them a lot of publicity suggesting it would cut down on viruses. That fits my definition of a publicity stunt.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]