Felony By Proxy?
from the tough-call dept
Aaron writes "So here's an interesting question. The latest MPAA anti-piracy legislation to be introduced, the Artists' Rights and Theft Prevention Act, makes sharing ANY pre-released pirated films on an openly accessible network a felony. Offenders face jail time up to five years and up to $250,000 in fines. So what happens to users whose servers are taken advantage of and aren't aware they're sharing the files? ISP Planet explores the idea of "tagging" servers with directories for warez that can't be deleted without special software. Broadband Reports has an article wondering if the MPAA lawyers are going to buy the "I didn't know" defense as an excuse. That defense hasn't held up well in other unrelated hacking cases." And it won't hold up well in these cases either. The MPAA will state flat-out that almost everyone using such a defense is lying. While it is very likely that many illegal films will show up on someone's unsuspecting servers, the MPAA is not known for caring about little technology details like that. The only thing going in favor of the "I didn't know" defense is that it actually has been working in some cases where it seems fairly unlikely. Witness the recent string of cases using the chewbacca style "a hacker did this to my computer, not me" defenses for everything from denial of service attacks to child porn to tax fraud. In the end, it will come down to how convincing an argument someone can make that they didn't really put the files on their own servers.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
How many bits of clueless legislation must we see this year?
Like the BBR report says, Chuck Schumer's "Do not spam" list (passed recently I think) is just begging for problems....
Maybe there should be some "tech senator" portion of congress that deals with issues the "vanilla" senators are too stupid to understand?
Though we'd likely wind up with all Verizon ex-Ceo's as senators in this niche, and be worse off...
Road to hell, paved with....etc. etc.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ohhh, the fun of SPAM!
Can you imagine the fun of the lawsuits WRT SPAM comming from a trojaned windows box?
As 'ignorance is not an excuse' - think about a few $5,000 or more lawsuits over being spammed where 'Grandma' gets stuck with a 5K+ legal bill.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Here's a thought for you...
This often achives better results that trying to pick and click. I get the data quicker and I can review what has been downloaded without having to try 10 different sources that don't share but show up in the search results.
Problem is, I sometimes get content that I shouldn't. This usually goes away when I apocalypse my machine (appologies to Larry Wall) when I have too much cruft to ever clean out by hand... In the mean time, I guess I'll just have to risk being a fellon.
...So, I would suggest that "guilt" is in the intent. If you're television set recieves cell phone calls, sould the FCC be able to prosicute you? I think the war on drugs is stupid enough... we we really need to produce a bunch of innocent criminals in the war on technology (nobody calls it this, but that's what it really is)?
[ link to this | view in thread ]