The Rise Of Second Degree Spam
from the spam-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder dept
While the Direct Marketing Association continues to push for a definition of spam that would make only fraudulent emails spam, they seem to be ignoring the fact that most spam is defined simply as "emails I don't want" - whether legitimate or not. And, under that real world definition, more and more spam is coming from so-called "legitimate" sources. People are starting to call this email "second degree spam". It's not unsolicited, because the receiver signed up at one point or another, but the company delivering the marketing messages has done nothing to make those emails relevant - and thus, in the user's eye, they're no different than spam. The marketers seem to be ignoring this because they think it's to their benefit. They're wrong. The more that lazy marketers simply blast people with irrelevant emails just because they think it's okay that someone "opted-in", the less people will pay attention to these emails. If they actually focused on customizing the messages and providing what people wanted without inundating them with useless stuff, they might actually get a good return. Unfortunately, it's easier to be lazy and use a "scorched earth" policy of blasting out as many messages as possible - even if it will only work to destroy email as a marketing mechanism.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Oh, we used to do this
She loved to send e-mail to customers. She would order us to send one after another -- weekly stuff, special promotions, etc. The tech folks (who didn't work for her) made all sorts of noise that it would drown out our occasional *real* messages. It didn't matter.
She would send tech-related messages to non-tech people. She would send conference-related messages to people who bought books from the company. She would justify everything with 'they're out customer and they opted in.'
Finally, the people who sent out the messages simply stopped. They told her they were sending them, but didn't. Simple solution, and now the company can send the occasional mail knowing that (hopefully) she hasn't spoiled the pot.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
more frequent means more annoying
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
legitimate sources
The problem arrises when I try to explain to others when to use the unsubscribe link, and when its use puts up a neon spam-me sign.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]