Good Time To Be In The Computer Security Business

from the the-worse-things-get,-the-better-business-is dept

While IT spending still isn't increasing noticeably, it turns out that a larger and larger portion of the budget is focused on security spending. In other words, security companies have done a bad enough job protecting computers that security is becoming a bigger and bigger problem - and those security companies are now profiting from it. Now, I'm sure that the security firms are doing their best to stop problems, but the incentives are still misaligned. The more security problems there are, the more the security vendors seem to make. This encourages them to be reactive, rather than proactive about security.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Jeremiah, 21 Nov 2003 @ 1:39pm

    No Subject Given

    Before I became an internet rock star, I tried my hand at IT Sec consulting. The issue we kept running into was liability: i.e., if your bank customer was to be made aware of security issues, then they'd *know* they had a problem, and then forced to take action. The head-in-the-sand approach is still less expensive for many companies in the long run, as security investments tend to become perpetual cost-centers on accounting worksheets.

    As once put eloquently by a manager for a major west-coast telco: "I'm not going to pay you $5k to find me a $10k problem."

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Nov 2003 @ 8:58am

    Re: No Subject Given

    ..and my retor would have been:

    Of course you are, otherwise it could end up costing you $50,000 or more... and that would have been in writing, CC'ed to his boss.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.