Should Companies Be Sued For Allowing Pornographic Spam?

from the can-only-do-so-much dept

Here come the lawyers. This topic has been discussed before, but as the spam problem gets worse, more lawyers are sensing a chance to make a little extra money, so it's coming up again. Lawyers are now looking to sue companies that allow pornographic spam to reach employee in-boxes saying that it creates an unsafe working environment. Of course, companies already know what a pain spam is to their employees, and they would love to stop it. The problem is that spam is very difficult to stop effectively, and many spam-stopping solutions create additional problems as well (whether its additional maintenance costs or lost legitimate emails). Blaming the spam on the companies that don't use filters seems a bit misplaced. The people who should be blamed are the spammers themselves. Besides, in most cases, the spam is due to someone letting their email address become public. If these lawsuits are valid, then it actually will encourage people to be fast and loose with their email address to get as much porn spam as possible - just to sue their employers.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Chris, 3 Dec 2003 @ 8:11am

    No Subject Given

    It's not about right and wrong, or blame. It's about enriching the bank accoounts of the lawyers. The best way to do that is to sue the companies that have money.

    I'm surprised it took this long.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Frank, 3 Dec 2003 @ 8:41am

    No Subject Given

    On one hand this seems like a slippery slope (how far are we from "this salesman I don't know called me through my work phone, my employer should not let people I don't know harass me like that, it's just like spam!"). But then again, with more and more companies assuming editorial review over what web sites employees can view, and what they can write in e-mails, and whether they can use instant messenging (and yes, whether they can play games), a sort of "well, if my boss can control everything, then control the spam, or it's the boss's fault!" response was inevitable.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Dec 2003 @ 1:27pm

    No Subject Given

    If these lawsuits are valid, then it actually will encourage people to be fast and loose with their email address to get as much porn spam as possible - just to sue their employers. that's the dumbest thing I've heard in a while.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.