Now That Number Portability Is Out Of The Way, How About Phone Portability?

One by one, consumers are looking to breakdown all the "lock-in" efforts of wireless carriers. While consumers are happy (more or less) that they now have local number portability, some are speaking up about the annoying fact that it's nearly impossible to take your phone with you when you port your number. There are any number of good technical reasons why this is so: incompatibilities with GSM/CDMA/iDEN/TDMA/AMPS, different data platforms, custom phone software, etc, but consumers are still complaining, and some wonder if, eventually, carriers are going to be forced to allow phone portability as well. Would it be nice? Absolutely. We're all for things that make consumers' lives better, but on this one, we're willing to say that there are some technological hurdles that may be too high. Service providers differentiate their services by the final tweaks they put into their phones, and many differentiations are for the better. Carriers would also be unable to provide support for terminals they did not sell and with which they are not familiar. The end result, at this point, would probably not be worth it. Carriers also heavily subsidize phone purchases, but would do so less if those phones were portable. GSM customers have an advantage here, since (if their phone is not SIM locked) they can simply slip in another SIM card and subscribe to a new carrier that operates on the phones frequency. One thing consumers could demand is a ban on phones that are "SIM locked", which is where the carrier that locks the customer in to a multi-year contract in order to recoup the phone subsidy (this is fair) also locks the phone to that carrier forever (this is not fair).
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.