Charter Wants Verizon Treatment

from the hey,-no-fair! dept

Seeing the recent Verizon/RIAA subpoena decision the folks at cable provider Charter Communications have responded with a "what the hell?" since they just got a completely different ruling and were forced to hand over the names of 200 subscribers. So now, in light of the newer Appeals Court decision, the folks at Charter are going back to court and asking to have their decision overturned and asking the RIAA to give back the information on their 200 customers. Of course, I'm no lawyer, but I'm pretty sure the Verizon ruling is in a completely different circuit, so the Verizon ruling isn't actually a precedent. Still, it could make a court reconsider. Either way, it sounds like these sorts of cases may take a while to settle.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    deekayen, 25 Dec 2003 @ 12:24am

    IANAL

    AFAIK, any legal ruling, regardless of circuit is a precident. That includes *opinions* written by respected lawyers like in Janet Reno's office. The loophole with precidents is exactly as you suggested... they don't have to be followed, it's just a custom. No case is exactly the same and a judge can say a precident from another case somehow differs enough from what they're hearing to ignore the previous ruling. If precidents were always followed, Verizon wouldn't have immunity as the appeals court said.

    Some of the formal legal training I have does give me enough background to know that Congress passed a law that says ISPs are not different than a traditional mail carrier. You can't make your local mail guy go to court for delivering a CD with pirated software on it and Congress and Federal court said that should apply to ISPs too in 47 U.S.C. Section 230(c)(1) and Zeran v. America Online, Inc 129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir. 1997) respectively.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.