The Technology Behind Accounting Fraud
from the easy-as-colored-markers,-copiers-and-scanners dept
The NY Times is looking at three big accounting frauds (two from years past, and the current Parmalat fraud) to see what technology was used to fool the auditors in each case. The findings suggest that there's a lot more social engineering happening instead of really hiding the fraud. In each case, it looks like it's just a question of presenting faked documents created with colored pens, copying machines or scanners. In each case, if the auditors had actually looked beyond the documents they were presented with, the fraud would have become apparent very quickly.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Low tech fraud
[ link to this | view in thread ]
investiagor modius operandi
1 - it tends to be hard to find and verify
2 - it's not how the investiagor usually works
With that in mind, I wonder how much technical fraud is executed on a daily basis, completely undetected.
As for Enron, I would argue that a lot of their initial fraud (manipulation of the energy market and attempting to corner other finite resource markets) that allowed them to operate "legitimately" was overshadowed by the days leading up to their eventual collapse.
Still, who the fsck cares if you can prove that they added 50cents per kilowatt hour to energy prices in a certain market just by shunting long-haul circuits around, when you can parade "bilked" mom&pop investors who lost "millions".
One make for far better court room theater...
[ link to this | view in thread ]