New News Aggregator: Topix
from the looks-nice dept
As you might imagine, here at Techdirt, we're always experimenting with new ways to track down news. We use a variety of tools that are available out there, and some that we've scraped together ourselves. The folks who started the Open Directory Project (which was eventually bought by Netscape) have just launched a beta test of their new offering, Topix.net, which is an online news aggregator. There are others like it, but on a first pass, this one looks pretty good. It clearly competes with things like Google News, though, the search functionality isn't as advanced. However, what it does do, quite well, is builds very directed drill down feeds, and categorizes stories within those feeds. Some of the feeds are focused on locations, and some go all the way down to news about a specific celebrity. For a beta offering, it's pretty impressive. For those who will ask, they don't currently offer things like RSS feeds, but plan to in the future. We don't normally do "product release" announcements like this, but it seemed like it would be interesting to folks who come here - and the service is impressive enough at beta that we figured people might be interested. Update: Figured this might happen. In posting this we've had a few others contact us as well about news aggregator services. Clearly, we won't be lacking in these types of services - which is a good thing. Another one that looks interesting is Gixo, which also tries to do some personalization based on what you click on. It seems fairly limited at this point, but has some potential. It also reminds me of Memigo, which has a lot of personalization included, but the interface can be a little overwhelming at first.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
loops
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: loops
Now, I agree with you that there are so many levels of meta you can put on top of actual content until there is little value left. That's not what I am trying to do. If you look closely, you will see that memigo doesn't link to Techdirt discussions for instance, although it gets referred links from here; that's only done because the forums here are usually empty and low-traffic. If TD had enough interesting meta-content itself like Slashdot or MeFi, I would add its forums to the site. I built memigo to function as I myself browse: I follow links from sites I trust (like TD) and when such a link gets picked up from a big group weblog, I (sometimes) want to read that discussion. That's the idea, not grabbing click-thrus.
Anyways, I hope you give memigo and try and change your mind :-)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Findory News
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Make my little world smaller?
Personalized news stories are the 4th sign of the apocolypse. Look, if I want specialized news - movie news, for example - I'll go to a movie site. Or a magazine that specializes in it.
But personalized news stories? If I go there and drill down again and again about things I like, rather than get an overview of "the world" (at least as the media portrays it) I'd have missed the 9/11 attacks for 57 stories about Jude Law's next movie. Unless there's a reference, like, "Jude Law's next movie cancelled by 9/11 attacks!"
Overstating the obvious to make the point. Excite and Yahoo have tried personalized homepages years ago. Personalization is overrated.
The biggest problem - you guys are screwing with technology for technology's sake, rather than getting out in the world and seeing what real people are doing / are missing and filling that hole! That's what makes businesses successful. They fill a hole. That's the root of the whole dotcom crash - selling shoes online sounded great, until someone stopped to think that, "hey, I have to try the g@#$@ things on to see if they fit".
All that said: I LOVE Google News. Why? # 1 - the layout, easy to scan and read. # 2 - gives me an overview of "the world" from a North American POV. Faster and easier than checking out several different sources. Most of all - it SUMMARIZES things, doesn't give me 500 stories about one thing I like.
Neat technology, but keep thinking about it, and how it could help people in their lives.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Make my little world smaller?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Make my little world smaller?
If there's at least a few articles you aren't interested in, then you should be able to see the value of personalized news. You'd still get your overview, but it would stop wasting your time showing you articles you'd never be interested in.
Personalized news really isn't a big deal. It just makes reading the news a little easier and quicker.
[ link to this | view in thread ]