Fact, Fiction And Advertising In The Numbers

from the up-to dept

A long time ago technology marketers figured out that many people buying their products don't really understand them - but they do understand that "bigger number" usually should mean "better". Thus, bigger numbers were touted, even if they weren't realistic. That's why we've got 17 inch monitors with 15 inch "viewable area". That's why wireless carriers kept promoting their data services as being "up to" 144 kbps when you were likely to get 50 kbps on a good day. Now, the latest complaint is with the numbers used for 802.11g WiFi products. Of course, the 802.11g is supposed to be 54 Mbits/sec - but in the cold light of reality, no one is going to get that sort of speed. While the writer admits that everyone expects some loss due to "overhead", you might be surprised at how much. In testing 802.11g products, he couldn't get any more than 15 Mbits/sec which is less than a third the advertised speed. He called up a bunch of vendors, and they kind of shrug off the issue, either denying that it's misleading or giving a "yes, but..." type of answer. Of course, he doesn't even get to the biggest joke in all of this: most people buying 802.11g equipment are going home and hooking it up to their cable or DSL modems that throttle down any throughput to a tiny fraction of what the router can handle.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    DL, 27 Jan 2004 @ 2:17pm

    Tiny

    "a tiny fraction of what the router can handle"

    You're assuming that all they are doing with their wireless router is browsing the web.

    What if they are using it to send video from their "server" PC to one or more client screens around the house?


    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    Mike (profile), 27 Jan 2004 @ 2:40pm

    Re: Tiny

    No, I understand that. However, most people aren't doing that right now. I did say "most".

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Beck, 27 Jan 2004 @ 4:02pm

    AMD Does it Too

    For example, the AMD Athlon XP 2800+ runs at about 2.1 ghz.

    (Although there's certainly more to a computer's performance than just the processor speed)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Mikester, 27 Jan 2004 @ 4:13pm

    No Subject Given

    Don't even get me started on computer hard drives and their advertised vs actual capacity!

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.