Companies Collect More Customer Data... Much Of It Wrong Or Useless
from the well,-that's-helpful dept
While various companies are getting ever more intrusive about the data they're collecting on you, they seem to forget that the whole point of collecting this data is to be able to do something with it. However, many companies don't do much at all, and much of the data they collect is wrong or useless - so-called dirty data. Some of this is because they're collecting different data in different systems, and other times it's because of human error. I'd add one more reason: people are sick of giving up their information for nothing in return. It's been shown that people don't mind giving up a little info if they get something back for it, but if all they're getting back is spam - then that's of no value to them whatsoever. It's as if these marketers have had it drilled into their heads that they need more data for marketing purposes, but forgot to go to class the second day to figure out what you do with that data to make customers' lives better, not worse. Until they figure that out, the quality of the data isn't going to get much better.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Pay for information
[ link to this | view in thread ]
why should we?
The way I see it, if the data becomes dirty enough they will stop collecting it. If that means that once free content must be purchased, then that's fine with me, because at least the real terms of the exchange are stated up front rather than getting something at the price of being harassed by spam or have your mailbox crammed full of dead trees for the rest of your life.
The amount of physical junk mail that goes straight in the trash can is a travesty, because in addition to all the reasons spam is bad, it's also adding huge amounts of waste to our landfills. But it's not going away anytime soon.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Data collection
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Data collection
Personally I'm starting to seek out places to enter garbage data.
I've also gone from entering outrageously strange data (that is easily filtered) to "plausible" data...ie: that COULD be real..but isn't and is just fake enough to be useless.
I mean if you just keep putting in stuff like "I.P Freely" or "Screw. U. Marketter" and stuff like that, it can be easily filtered out and forgotten, but if you enter "David Frobish" whose 42 and makes 67 grand a year in a real area code...but its a totally fake person...the DB is dirty and there's no way to extract THAT record without a lot of work.
To Marketting execs: SCREW YOU! WE ARE FED UP!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Data for sale ...
I couldn't agree any more heartily !
Hear, Hear !
Marketing people have become so intrusive that I no longer want to give correct information if @ all possible.
@ Cash registers when the sales clerks ask for my zip code it's : " 90210 "
On websites that ask for data before providing content I am the exact opposite of my true self and always am in the highest income bracket.
Phone #'s ?
Use this: 410-347-1488 - It's the " Rejection Hotline " Callers hear a prerecorded message that sez you've been given this fake # because you're a loser. They have a list of #'s on their website that may be closer to where you live.
When I'm asked for marketing information I inform the questionnaire that that information is available for a fee depending on how much information they want. Phone #, hmmm today that costs $ 30.00. Want my address, that sells for $ 50.00. When they retort that they can just obtain that information in public directories or court houses I tell them by all means do so.
If it has so much value, then they can buy it like the prodcuts & services I am buying from them
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Data for sale ...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Data for sale ...
A grassroots thing...
For a healthy privacy...poison the marketting databases.
Something like that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Data for sale ...
Thank you !
One more piece to add to my arsenal ...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
data collection was oversold
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Database Marketing
A. Recycle! That saves trees. (I know that is only treating a symptom and not the cause, there are plenty of ways to opt out of mailing lists, though it can take some work.)
B. Customers don't have to be paid to be inticed to enter in accurate information. It definitely is about the value of the transaction. If I, as a consumer, don't want some company contacting me, I'll use a throw-away address (i.e. like I am using mailinator now).
C. I think everyone missed the point of the article, but I do agree that the amount of data required by companies today is insane. Most don't have a clue what to do with it. Even if you are giving a checkout person a false ZIP, if you run your credit card, they know where you live.
Visit CASPIAN's nocards.org for more info about consumer privacy. Since there already is an effort towards improving companies already, I thought people would appreciate it. They are definitely one-sided regarding issues and borders on scare tactics, but I think it is informative to the privacy novice.
Marketing is about relationships, and the companies that you want to have a relationship with are the ones that you will want to give information to. Other companies need to work to build that trust rather than hammering away to get data.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Data for sale ...
Make sure you either live in an unincorporated area or have a business license from your city, especially if you do this more than a couple times a year. I could see this backfiring on you if the marketeer wanted to be a prick, as most cities (they are all on wellfare, no matter where you live,) want you to have a permit before you start charging people for "service," and failure to do so could get you reported and the fines for operating a business (collecting money for services) are not small.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Database Marketing
Thanks Joe, as a consumer, I wish bad Marketeers would listen to your good words of advice. For one, they would be more likely to get my money (if they had a product I was interested in,) if they treated me with respect and didn't ask for stuff they neither needed nor used.
Its been talked about here before, but I am much more happy to provide information to those who ask for it when I know they will treat the information I give them with respect. Some companies send me unsolicited (well, it is unsolicited in the fact that I haven't asked them to send it,) mail, yet I don't consider it SPAM because it is tailored to me, and is from a company that I regularly buy products or services from.
SPAM and lack of respect for privacy are important issues that most business folks who have received their degrees within the last 10 years have apparently been taught is a good thing, even though everyone knows it isn't.
It is unfortunate that this sort of attitude is encouraged in school; I graduated within the last 10 years as a computer scientist, which until recently at that university, was considered part of the business school. One of the business teachers (who was also a business ethics instructor!) was fired and several of the students placed on probation because the teacher actively advocated cheating on tests and assignments.
Most folks outside the University dismissed it as a single occasion of bad judgement, though those of us in the computer science classes knew that it was rampant; I was offered several hundred dollars a semester during the first year when taking remedial computer classes by business majors taking computer classes to do their programming assignments, (which of course I turned down and reported to the teacher,) and I wasn't alone. One of my friends was expelled from the university for actually taking the money and providing a business student with the programming assignments to finish the class.
Of course, there were many business students who had ethics, but with everything, those who don't have ethics make a bad name for those who do. I suspect there are a large minority of Marketeers who are making a bad name for everyone else too.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Database Marketing
You say marketing is about relationships. Well I'm not the only customer who feels he's being constantly date-raped by my SO marketer. Most marketers aren't thinking in terms of "relationship" they think in terms of "wallets", and basically I (and MANY others) do NOT feel that marketers listen, or even CARE about how customers feel...we bear the most stretched truths, the tiniest fine prints and obscure language all in the name of "tricking" us out of a buck...and it WORKS too because if someone spent the time to check out each and every single detail out of all the transactions that go on in the day...we wouldn't have the time to EARN the money that's being stolen from us...that's right I said stolen.
Ok, maybe marketting isn't COMPLETELY to blame for this (I have a healthy hate for large corps too) but they ARE the front line soldiers for this...and I'm sorry, I just don't see any ethics in your marketting messages anymore.
Its sad that YOU as a good guy, are the very small exception, NOT the rule.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A better phone number to use...
555 1212. I regularlly use that whenever prompted for a phone number. I once has a clerk at LL Bean comment 'Wow that is an easy number to remember' and he wasn't some pimply faced boy but someone in their 30s.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A possibly incorrect assumption
[ link to this | view in thread ]
i want to be an international marketter
i am a nigerian and i would love to be one of your marketters.
i have an ssce qualifications and three years experience in marketting.
i would be very happy when my request is granted.
yours faithfully,
jonathan praise.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Zip codes...
You may find that next year you don't have to travel across town to get what you need anymore...
I think the problem of "forgetting what the data's for" has happened on both ends. We've been taught to hate giving up data, companies have beent taught to get it at any cost... the way of most things I guess... it was a good idea at the time.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
blocked....
Reason:
The Websense category "Hacking" is filtered.
hmm.....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Collecting ZIPs
On a hilarious related note, the gas pumps started asking for ZIP codes a few years ago when using a credit card. The first time I saw that, I entered 90210 - and it declined my card. The bad part was that then it wouldn't re-authorize my card when I put in the right number. Not even when I moved to another pump at the same station. I had to drive to a different station to gas up!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Use 20-80 Rule To Keep Data Useful
After years of working with all these providers processing B2B data, one thing comes top of mind regarding keeping data clean and useful, and it's simply this: focus.
Marketers simply DO NOT tend to focus on the most critical data elements they need to become EFFECTIVE. I always insist on having them categorize the data they need in terms of 4 classifications: 1) Timeliness, 2) Accuracy, 3) Consistency and 4) Completeness.
If they can tell me in terms of actual data points what it is they need that must be timely, accurate, complete and consistent over some vector of operation, then it's easier for me to ask "So, if I give you those data points at that level of quality, will they ensure that you be effective in accomplishing a particular marketing goal?" If the answer is yes, then I ask for proof.
Most of the time when you put the pressure on the marketer to formulate the proof, you come to realize easily that the data set they perceive as being critical in achieving that particular effectiveness goal is actually not the right data to run with. The users actually need different data that they had not even come to realize was necessary to support operational effectiveness.
But if you come to identify that critical data set, then rest assured that you're more likely to have a major impact on the operation if you deliver on improved data quality, including having an argument in hand for minimizing data capture across multiple contact touch points, than if you just ran with whatever came out first from the user's mouth.
What makes collecting these data criteria from marketers difficult? Mental discipline.
The marketing mindset simply doesn't work this way. It's literally painful for a marketer to have to sit through a discussion on data quality and operations process, unless you're working with a marketing ops analyst or marketing IT process strategist. It's like asking an interior decorator to sit through a discussion on the chemistry of paint. But it's not impossible to do. Just give it a try.
[ link to this | view in thread ]