Should VoIP Be Taxed?

from the the-question-of-the-day dept

Well, lots of people have been talking about it, but Senator Lamar Alexander yesterday stated publicly that states should be able to tax VoIP system. The problem I have with this is that there seems to be no justification for this whatsoever, other than that states already tax telephone calls. In other words, this is a tax designed solely to boost state revenue - not because it creates some sort of expense that the state covers. It seems like the calls to tax VoIP are more because they can, and not because they should.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Patrick, 25 Feb 2004 @ 9:06am

    Taxing VOIP

    Nope, should not be taxed. Nothing was provided, nothing should be 'paid' for.

    This probably will happen anyway, though.

    What can I say? Vote Libertarian.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    alternatives, 25 Feb 2004 @ 10:06am

    Already *IS* taxed.

    1) Sales tax (in some places)
    2) FCC taxes on the lines that bring you the internet

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 25 Feb 2004 @ 10:36am

    No Subject Given


    Just allowing something doesn't automatically necessitate taxing it as well.

    The same argument goes for weed.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    DV Henkel-Wallace, 25 Feb 2004 @ 2:21pm

    like all taxes

    It seems like the calls to tax VoIP are more because they can, and not because they should.
    Like all taxes! What should be taxed anyway?

    Remember Colbert's characterisation of a tax policy? "get the most feathers from the goose with the minimum of hissing." You tax what and where you can.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Adrian Anders, 25 Feb 2004 @ 3:45pm

    VoIP tax, progressive?

    I would say yes, because most individuals who would pay for this tax have broadband, and in many cases a fairly recent computer. Thus this tax would target only those who have more than enough money to spend on such a tax. I say its much better than taxing everyone further (including lower middle class families), or cutting needed programs like education, roads, etc.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Nate, 26 Feb 2004 @ 9:57am

    So what do you want taxed instead?

    Less phone calls being made over the PSTN, less tax revenue going into the state coffers. This means that in order to enjoy the services of the state, the tax revenue needs to come from something else. Besides, what this posting is calling VoIP is a poor excuse really. Having designed and installed Tier 1 Carrier Class VoIP (not this computer to computer garbage), I'll stick with the PSTN connecting to carrier VoIP.

    What would you like to be taxed instead?

    Look at it this way...I don't smoke...can't stand smoking at all, BUT I don't want to see smoking go away any time soon. Reason being that the smokers pay a large portion of the taxes that I don't have to pay through their purchases.

    Now if only the smokers would actually take responsibility for picking up the habit and pay for their own medical expenses...but that's another story. Nobody can convince me that they didn't know that smoking would be bad for them. Ever been on the downwind side of a campfire?

    Stepping off the soapbox now.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2004 @ 11:08am

      Re: So what do you want taxed instead?



      yeah & perhaps fat people will pick up THEIR share of the medical costs too ...

      FAT chance

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.