Canadian Case Raises Issues About Who's Really Sharing Music

from the need-more-proof? dept

The Canadian battle over whether or not ISPs need to reveal the names of people who are being accused by the recording industry of sharing music is one of the first that actually raises the issue of proving who did the actual file sharing. While this has been brought up in discussions on the internet, it's the first time I've seen it actually raised during a file sharing related lawsuit. The recording industry can try to track down who pays for the connection - but that doesn't mean they know who actually did the sharing. In fact, the ISPs in Canada are specifically using the open WiFi example to point out that just about anyone could have been using a connection to share files, and it's wrong to accuse just the person who pays for the connection without any more proof that it was actually them.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Bish, 25 Feb 2004 @ 10:06pm

    Woo!

    Wow! It's taken *this* long for the question of identifying the 'criminal' to come up? What have yo lot been *doing* down there? Don't you all have some constitution that protects you all from being wiretapped without cause and arrested without a clear identification?

    Or has some moron taken those away again?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Saygin(?), 26 Feb 2004 @ 9:43am

      Re: Woo!

      Well... wiretap (and search) went away with the Patriot Act. (I'm exaggerating a bit, but not by much.)

      ID is pending in the courts right now.

      And copyright - as of the DMCA - never much concerned itself with constitutional protections anyway.

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.