Camera Phone Law Moving Forward In Chicago
from the going-a-bit-too-far. dept
Alan Reiter points us to the fact that Chicago politicians are pushing forward with laws against camera phones. The main part of the law isn't horrible, in that it actually is forbidding the action, not the technology. It would fine people $500 for transmitting a picture taken in a place where people should expect privacy (such as a locker room). Odd, though, that the law seems specific to just transmitting a picture, and not the actual taking of the picture. In other words, this law, apparently, would not prevent someone from using a regular digital camera, taking a picture, uploading it to a computer and sending it. As long as it doesn't use a camera phone, it's fine. At the same time, the law still does include a ban on having a camera phone in these locations unless the camera part is "non operational" - though, they don't explain what they mean by that. Does it mean the phone needs to be off? Or that the camera itself must be disabled? If the crime is in taking (or transmitting) the picture, then why does it matter if the camera works or not if the person isn't taking a picture? Also, it appears that one politician has been suckered into believing the unproven story that identity thieves are snapping camera phone photos of credit cards while standing in line at the checkout counter. This politician wants to add into the law a piece that would make it illegal to use a camera phone in such a situation. Don't we already have laws against the violation of privacy and identity theft? Don't they cover these actions? Why do we need specific laws aimed at this tool, which really isn't particularly different than plenty of other tools out there?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Anti-Indecency Weapon
If I had a cell phone camera, it would have been funny to capture the expressions on their faces.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
WalMart took the bait
I wonder if the urban-legend trackers have considered this corporate training method as a spread-and-perpetuate vector. One corporate memo from WalMart headquarters is suddenly treated as gospel by tens of thousands of people nationwide.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: WalMart took the bait
I just don't understand all this fear against camera phones.
People seem to have no problem with all the " security " cameras watching us 24/7 but the thought of an individual actually having the technology @ their disposal seems to worry everyone.
No one ever mentions that camera phones ALSO have the added feature of allowing the user to be able to capture crimes in progress, license plates of law breakers, etc ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: WalMart took the bait
I'm pretty sure I glance over a shoulder and just write down the digits in my PDA (or day planner) without anyone thinking twice.
At least temporarily memorizing five groups of four digits isn't that hard.
Finally, a credit card number is fairly useless for identity theft. You need a social to apply for new cards, that's the key.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]