If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Hertz Ordered To Tell Court How Many Thousands Of Renters It Falsely Accuses Of Theft Every Year
- Even As Trump Relies On Section 230 For Truth Social, He's Claiming In Lawsuits That It's Unconstitutional
- Letter From High-Ranking FBI Lawyer Tells Prosecutors How To Avoid Court Scrutiny Of Firearms Analysis Junk Science
- FTC Promises To Play Hardball With Robocall-Enabling VOIP Providers
- FOIA Lawsuit Featuring A DC Police Whistleblower Says PD Conspired To Screw Requesters It Didn't Like
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
fight in court, or just raise the price
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: fight in court, or just raise the price
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Good for the schools?
I wonder if this will include a stipulation that the $600 million should be used by Microsoft to procure 60,000 machines @ $10,000 a pop (for Microsoft software and hardware, though you could find comparable machines without Microsoft software for 1/10th to 1/20th of that cost,) to give to poor and disadvantaged schools in Europe like the sweetheart deal they gave schools here in the US (which will come back to haunt these schools in the future.)
If I were Microsoft, I'd be looking right now into how to spin this into EU's plan if an appeal is not awarded, since ultimately such a deal will further Microsoft's goals while limiting their cash outflow.) Of course, I am not Microsoft, and I would love to see the EU turn around and say "you wish to appeal? no problem, the fine is now 3 billion..." and when Microsoft tries this crap like they did in the US, the EU should turn around and say, "yes, Microsoft, you can buy computers for the schools, but they have to be less that $2000 per machine, and Lindows, SuSE, or whatever, has to be installed on all of them (no Microsoft software allowed, period.)"
[ link to this | view in thread ]