Do Feeble Arguments Justify PTO's Eolas Findings?
from the coulda-woulda-shoulda dept
theodp writes "In its Eolas Plug-In Patent Reexam Findings (pdf file), the USPTO finds the W3C-provided prior art flawed, but tosses in the 'teachings of Berners-Lee' (e.g., 'HTML browsers parse HTML'), the first 12 pages of a 1987 OO book (e.g., 'applying object oriented techniques to software makes the software more tolerant to change'), an article about rumored changes to circa-1993 X Windows, and a healthy dose of coulda-woulda-shoulda (e.g., 'it would have been obvious') to justify its conclusion that all ten of the patent's claims are meritless. While the decision may save Microsoft $521 million, it's too bad the USPTO had to resort to such feeble arguments (e.g., the 'teachings of Berners-Lee' were also cited in GRANTING the patent!) and vaporware. Documentation of successfully implemented prior art was readily available, but the W3C elected to disregard the public's input. "
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Let's Blame W3C for the USPTO ruling...
The W3C challenged based on the data it chose to, anyone could have filed using any data they want.
In short: Stop trying to bash W3C because they didn't do what you wanted them to.
[ link to this | view in thread ]