Details On The Keystroke Logger Case... Was He Just A Whistleblower?
from the getting-more-interesting dept
Earlier this week, we wrote about a California man who was charged with wiretapping for using a keystroke logger on the machine. Security Focus (as they're good at doing) has many more details on the case, including an interview with the guy. It turns out, as people suggested in the comments here, the keystroke logger was a hardware dongle that fit between the computer and the keyboard connector. What's more interesting, though, is the guy's claim that he was just a whistleblower, and was collecting evidence of fraudulent practices at his firm. He even had met with California's Department of Insurance about the issue. However, no matter who he met with, it doesn't give him the right to break the law to prove his point and the Department of Insurance insists that they never told him to do anything illegal to collect evidence.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Was he a whistleblower?
Is the law wrong? Probably, because it doesn't take into account very legal reasons for needing a keyboard sniffer. Is he a whistleblower? No doubt if he had information about bad things the company was doing. Was he justified in doing what he did? Absolutely not, it is still against the law and violates the secretary's privacy, for she could be writing personal email (such as telling another person at her company about an affair she is having, or other ultra-sensitive topics the guy had no right to listen to.)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Was he a whistleblower?
But which ones (federal)?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wiretap
wiretapping device, (they'd failed to get a wiretap warrant) yet they
charged this guy with violating wiretapping laws for using a keylogger. It
would be interesting to know what the differences are between these
keyloggers are, and why using only one of them constitutes "wiretapping."
-bernieS
[ link to this | view in thread ]