As Expected, Publishers Misusing Intrusive Video Ad Study Results
from the extrapolate-a-little,-please... dept
Unicast has been getting a lot of attention lately for their solution that lets websites broadcast full TV-style commercials online. The "innovation" is that they load in the background, so the quality of the video is better. Last month, we wrote about a study of those testing the format suggesting the ads annoyed fewer people than expected and we predicted that due to a misinterpretation of those results, we should expect to see a lot more ads. It didn't take long. The head of Reuters.com is practically begging advertisers to sign up for such ads. As we mentioned when that study came out, he's focusing on the "only 28% were annoyed" number. First of all, the fact that any decision is being based on "number of people annoyed" instead of "number of people helped" is more than a bit shortsighted. Second, he didn't bother to think that maybe (just maybe!) the reason people weren't annoyed were because this was new and different and they were being asked what they thought. If these ads start showing up everywhere you go, expect many more people to be annoyed by them. Furthermore, "only 28%" seems like a pretty big number to me. Pissing off people usually has a much bigger negative impact than the positive impact of not pissing people off. Is it really worth risking completely driving away one-third of your potential customers just because the other two-thirds "don't find your ads annoying?" As we pointed out yesterday, there are ways to use video advertising online, but it involves actually understanding the nature of the internet, and not just believing it's the second coming of TV. Intrusive and unexpected advertising doesn't work in a truly interactive medium.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
