Still Probably Don't Want To Rent Movies Online

from the not-much-improvement dept

About a year ago, we linked to a review that absolutely trashes the two Hollywood-backed online movie rental operations, Movielink and CinemaNow. It looks like things haven't improved much over the past year. The Washington Post now has a review of both services that wonders who would ever bother using such services. It includes such descriptive phrases as "little here to lure anybody," "annoying to use," "agonizingly slow," and "pathetically thin selection." Oh yeah, plus they're fairly expensive for what you get, and unless you've got your PC hooked up to your TV, you're stuck watching them at your desk. As for the "pathetically thin selection" the companies blame problems in getting the internet rights to films. In fact, it's a bit amusing to hear him complain that the reason they can't offer a movie like "Ferris Bueller's Day Off" is because the music rights to the song "Twist and Shout" (which appears briefly in the movie) cost too much to obtain. Funny how that strict licensing rights for music are harming the ability to get movies online. In a more enlightened world, such a statement might make Hollywood wake up to the idea that perhaps our current intellectual property system is a bit too heavy handed - but clearly that's not going to happen any time soon.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Bastard Sammy, 5 Apr 2004 @ 7:36am

    No Subject Given

    It's growing pains, I think.
    These things take time. Especially when new media is involved, and old assholes still hold the rights to everything. I think this will probably change over the next two or three decades or so as motion picture studios and record companies are dragged kicking and screaming into the 21st century. Espcially when they all get together and realize how much money there is to be made.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Jeff R, 5 Apr 2004 @ 7:53am

    No Subject Given

    Why should the rental place need to deal with that? Didn't the movie's producers pay for those rights when the movie was made? Shouldn't they have to pay for them out of their profits from the rentals? Seems backwards to me...

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.