Fighting Back Against Ringing Mobile Phones
from the a-little-peace-and-quiet-please... dept
There have been stories on mobile phone jammers before, but the NY Times has a longer article looking at a variety of methods to stop mobile phones from ringing inappropriately. There are the jammers of course - which remain illegal in the US. They are perfectly legal elsewhere, and (as you might imagine) are still being used in the US. However, there are, increasingly, other options. There are construction techniques that can supposedly block out cellular signals so that anyone inside a certain building will not be able to use their mobile phone. Of course, some are angered by such solutions, pointing out that just because a ringing phone annoys you, doesn't give you the right to stop others from using their phones. This argument gets a little tricky when you're talking about being on private property, though. However, as with many technology problems and solutions, given a bit of time, it looks like solutions are going to get a lot more sophisticated over time. Already, some are working on technology that will automatically switch mobile phones to silent or vibrate mode in certain places using Bluetooth. Of course, this will only work with certain phones - but hopefully a standardized version of such a solution will emerge. Even more impressive is some research being done at MIT to automatically know how to deal with incoming calls based on a variety of factors. I really wonder how well this works, but if it really can determine when it's right to pass a call through and when it should vibrate or when it should just go to voicemail, that would be impressive. Of course, there's a simple solution to all of this: just keep your phone on vibrate all the time.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Information Required
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
I Do.
It's the other people who have driven me out of many public places, such as theaters.
I'm HIGHLY in favor of "communications free" zones on PRIVATE property, such as theaters. Sheilding is one way to accomplish this. I believe a theatre owner would ATTRACT many, many, many more customers than they lost by advertising "no cell/pager ringing in my theater". Especially if it was pointed out that everything still functions just fine in the lobby.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
I look foward to this new tech, and hope that it is applied to vehicles as well. (yes, I am against driving and 'Holding' a phone.)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Emergency Calls
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Emergency Calls
I sympathize with your situation... it's clear that all the people who abuse the vibrate-v-ringer are going to effectively deprive you of the ability to communicate from certain locations if my earlier suggestion (shielding) is carried out.
However... you have choice: You can avoid the blocked zones if you feel you MUST have instant communictions, no matter what. I do not have choice: I cannot "not listen" to the abusers ringers.
In balancing the impacts like this, it is always easy to give an "end justifies the means" example like a sick child or a life that could be saved if only... but 99.9% of the time, it's balancing inconvience for hundreds v conveninece for one. And, in that one critical case, there are alternatives.
Having said all of that, my most favorite plan is not shielding, it's social disgrace. Rather than have a theater owner shield, what I'd like to see happen EVERY TIME a phone audibly rings in the theatre is every single member of the audience (other than the inconsiderate or forgetfull phone person) BOO and/or APPLAUD LOUDLY until the person is forced to walk out of the theater.
This plan would serve all interests: The person would remember to put their phone on vibrate next time; if it was a trivial call, they'd blow it off; if it were an important call, they could leave the theater and continue (or call back).
Perhaps this "boo to disgrace" could becom a culturally accepted solution. Would it work in a restaraunt as well?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Block Signals AND clearly post it ...
I believe strongly that businesses and people should have the right to block cell phone communication signals.
I ALSO strongly believe that there should be a law allowing people to block them as long as it is CLEARLY posted.
Then YOU get to make the decision weather or not you must have all the time communication AND the business or person gets the choice to protect themselves from unwanted annoyances like your cell phone ringing because your too much of a dolt to turn it to vibrate ...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Emergency Calls
Can you believe people would come up with stuff like this.
Remember the good old days without cell phones.
Must be Clintonites.....
SOS (stuck on stupid)
[ link to this | view in thread ]