Should Newbies Need To Read The Rules?
from the such-is-life dept
This idea seems to occur to everyone once they get frustrated enough with something stupid happening online. Here's yet another column suggesting that newbie internet users be required to read and understand a set of rules (such as "do not reply to spammers") before they can get online. Could anyone actually come up with a set of rules that everyone would actually agree with?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
A Simple test instead
Are you smart enough to understand that you aren't?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A Simple test instead
I'd also want to add...are you mature enough to understand that being semi-anonymous does not give you license to act like an asshole to piss people off on purpose? (For all the trolls and griefers out there)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A Simple test instead
What are you going to do about it? I can reply to spam too if I want and you can't do a thing about it.
Having 'rules' for the internet seems silly to me. If you can't enforce it, what's the point?
Education, better FAQs, learning curves, those do something. Rules just give kids something to rebel against IMO.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A Simple test instead
I agree to this as soon as stupid people are required to get a license to pop out babies and suck up welfare ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
It would be nice if users were some how required to be educated before they jumped on line as it might save some of the more gullable and/or less techno oriented a lot of troubles.
Some of the very basics (virus identification, ID theft, scams, credit card security, etc).
It might also dispell some of the myths that many users live under (my credit card info will be stolen !!!!)
But agreeing on what ... good luck. Hmmmm... would probably give state lawyers something to do. They could each come up with their own rules and treat them like drivers licenses (gotta get it before you surf). They could also charge for the test like the drivers license and alleviate some of their tax woes and renew it every 4 years to do a technology catch up ... and collect more taxes !!!!
What a great idea !!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Internet Rules
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]