Just Put A Cellular Tower In The Plane

from the yakking-while-flying dept

In something of a followup to a post from a few weeks ago, Guy Kewney is going through every reason given for banning mobile phones on planes and explaining why it doesn't have to be true. The real issue isn't one of danger (as has been pointed out many times before), but that each phone would be contacting so many cellular towers on the ground it would cause problems for the carriers. The simple solution (mentioned in that earlier article) is to place a modified mobile cellular tower on the plane that directs all communication down in a more appropriate manner. Having found such a local tower, the phones won't broadcast out to all the other towers on the ground. Still, some are worried about the danger issue, and Kewney systematically points out why all their arguments don't make sense. Of course, none of this addresses the annoyance issue - but perhaps we'll have airlines that advertise "no phoning" planes or zones and we'll basically be back to where we are now.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Roger Madden, 21 Apr 2004 @ 12:48pm

    re: Just put a Cellular Tower in the plane

    AirCell, Inc. holds a patent to do just that. See www.aircell.com

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    dorpus, 21 Apr 2004 @ 12:58pm

    No Subject Given

    So where are the "systematic" arguments you speak of? Your link only talks about straw man examples of having a pet wasp in the cockpit, or of Persian rugs.

    In this and other techie forums, I notice a tendency to ignore the evidence presented in actual cases where cell phone signals did cause problems for planes.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. icon
    Mike (profile), 21 Apr 2004 @ 1:15pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    Where is that evidence? We've been asking for evidence of the dangers for years, and no one ever seems to show it.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Nate, 21 Apr 2004 @ 1:53pm

    Which service?

    Which cell service would it handle? What are the chances that you could get the different standards companies to agree? What about international flights and their standards?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    dudeluna, 21 Apr 2004 @ 1:54pm

    Just Put A Cellular Tower In The Plane

    but do we really want a plane full of people talking on their cell phones? think about it! it would be awful!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    beck, 21 Apr 2004 @ 3:35pm

    Re: Just Put A Cellular Tower In The Plane

    Would it be any more awful than the people on the plane talking to each other? Why is it OK if the person behind you is yakking away to the person next to her, but not OK if she's yakking away on her phone?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 21 Apr 2004 @ 4:45pm

    Re: Which service?

    If the US (and Japan) carriers would just follow the rest of the world that particular issue wouldn't be a problem... but I guess you would still have the issue of new generations etc.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    dorpus, 21 Apr 2004 @ 7:12pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    I've posted links on here before showing the evidence. It's your blog, go find it.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    dorpus, 21 Apr 2004 @ 7:39pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    But, knowing that Mike will be too lazy to look up his own blog, accuse me of posturing or what not, I'll post the evidence again.

    e.g.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2992973.stm

    "...Since 1996, pilots have reported 35 mobile phone-related safety incidents, including false warnings in the cockpit, distractions causing aircraft to stray accidentally onto runways or fly at the wrong altitude, interrupted radio communications and multiple safety systems malfunctions. "

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. icon
    Mike (profile), 21 Apr 2004 @ 10:07pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    No, I have no problem looking it up. I did post it after all. However, as was pointed out at the time, those were anecdotal stories of problems that were blamed on the phones - with no evidence that it was actually phones that caused it. If the phones really presented such a threat to life, wouldn't we have heard about a real safety incident already? I've been on enough planes where I've seen people using mobile phones to know that there's a pretty good chance someone's got their's on on just about every large flight. Also, if it presented such a danger, wouldn't the airlines be a lot more strict about making sure the phones were off?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    Rick Colosimo, 21 Apr 2004 @ 11:00pm

    This is evidence? Of what?

    "And in October, Russian businessman Sergey Lebedev was fined £2,500 after forcing a British Airways jet to abort a landing at Manchester Airport.

    Cabin crew spent so long arguing with him about whether he would turn off his mobile they were unable to prepare the plane."

    That's pretty weak evidence that cell phones are a legitimate electronic threat to aircraft. Heck, it could be just as disruptive if I refused to put my tray table up!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    dorpus, 22 Apr 2004 @ 5:08am

    Re: No Subject Given

    So let's see, "interrupted radio communications" was only the result of space aliens having conversations? Couldn't possibly have come from cell phones? I've been on enough planes where I've seen people failing to fasten seat belts, but they did not die. There are only anecdotal tales of plane crashes. So how many planes should crash before cell phones are banned? 10? 100?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  13. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 22 Apr 2004 @ 7:43am

    It only takes one


    Only the plane you are on dorpus.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  14. identicon
    thecaptain, 22 Apr 2004 @ 12:45pm

    Re: Just Put A Cellular Tower In The Plane

    Because usually the person yakking away to the one next to him or her has a certain sense of decorum (USUALLY I say, this is not always the case).

    However, a MUCH HIGHER percentage of people who chat on cellphones do so at top volume, much more likely to annoy the crap out of everybody else.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  15. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 22 Apr 2004 @ 4:11pm

    ASRS reports

    http://asrs.arc.nasa.gov/report_sets/ped.pdf
    has several incidents, some of which do seem very like passengers' widgets screwing up nav systems.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.