Flooding File Sharing Networks With Bogus Files: Patented

from the seriously? dept

Well, here's a nice convergence story covering two topics we discuss on a regular basis: file sharing and ridiculous patents. A computer science professor has now received a patent on the process of flooding a file sharing network with bogus files to annoy people trying to download files. How is this not obvious? It didn't take a professor and a doctoral student to come up with this idea. Plenty of folks in the industry just went ahead and did it themselves. The professor also makes the same tired old mistake of saying that file sharing is the same thing as stealing a CD out of a store - something that even the Supreme Court has said is not true. Copyright infringement is definitely illegal, but it's not the same thing as stealing a physical object. Of course, some may say that this will make it more expensive for others to flood such P2P networks with fake files (and therefore a good thing), but relying on a bad patent isn't the way to go. I wonder if this patent covers flooding the patent office with bogus patents as well?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Number_6, 5 May 2004 @ 2:32pm

    Flooding patent office with ridiculous patents

    Too late, I already patented that idea...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    ::CORY::, 5 May 2004 @ 5:25pm

    my patent

    I am patenting the concept of having ideas for having new ideas for patents.

    Oh and while I am at it, I am patenting having ideas in general.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Phil Ringnalda, 5 May 2004 @ 9:37pm

    such Web sites as Kazaa

    I'm not sure I agree that he was saying the classic "just like stealing from a record store" (more "most people grasp that stealing from a record store is wrong, fewer grasp that copyright infringement is"), but the USA Today hack made up for Dr. Stupid Patent's failure to be clueless, by saying that it will be sold to record labels "who want to prevent their copyrighted products from being shared on such Web sites as Kazaa, LimeWire or BitTorrent." Dude! I've been screwing around trying to find some loser who will stay online long enough to download a copy of his crappy copy, and you can just get them from the Kazaa, LimeWire or BitTorrent Web site itself?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    NOBODY, 6 May 2004 @ 6:50am

    No Subject Given

    It's not downloading that's wrong or illegal. It's sharing. I Wonder though: Is the title of a piece of music or other media file copyrighted? If so, couldn't someone be committing copyright infringement by spreading bogus files with real names?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      AMetamorphosis, 6 May 2004 @ 8:32am

      No Subject Given


      Sharing in its self isn't illegal either.

      ie: streaming media

      Copying copyrighted material is illegal.

      Good point about copyright infringement by spreading bogus files with real names. Could that be construed as fraud as well ?

      Of course, the RIAA won't pursue " that " violation of copyright ...

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ioni, 17 Aug 2004 @ 2:02pm

    Doh!

    Wouldn't have been cool if this guy were a Kazaa user who just patented the flooding method to prevent the record companies from using it?
    This Professor & his PHD RA patented something already in used by others for money making purposes. I'm going to enjoy watching them trying to enforce their patent in the file sharing environment.
    “If anyone could enforce any property right in this environment we would not need your invention Professor”
    Anytime soon we will hear the professor quoting from the great Homer Simpson: "Doh!". Hope he doesn't patent this lament too. Watch out Matt Groening!

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.