WhenU Still Gaming Google In Other Ways
from the sneaky-sneaky-sneaky dept
Last week there was some news concerning Google and Yahoo's decision to ban WhenU's sites after it was determined that they were purposely using "cloaking" methods to get better rankings in their search results. WhenU quickly blamed an outside search engine optimizer. Jeremy Wagstaff points us to an updated story by Ben Edelman showing what looks like even more gaming of search engines by WhenU. It turns out that WhenU (possibly against copyright) has made many copies of 26 news articles favorable to them and placed them across 12 different websites owned by WhenU. This way, when Google is searching it picks up multiple copies with the theory being that these positive articles are more likely to show up in a search than any of the many negative articles about the company's practices.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Today's Update: WhenU Removed the Article Copies
From WhenU's removal of the articles, I infer that WhenU lacked authorization to reproduce the articles. If WhenU had previously obtained license to reproduce the articles, I would not expect WhenU to remove the articles when they began to get increased attention. In contrast, had WhenU failed to obtain authorization to reproduce the articles, I would expect WhenU to remove the articles upon public discussion of their existence -- the outcome in fact observed here.
Details and lots of screenshots at http://www.benedelman.org/spyware/whenu-copy/.
Ben Edelman
benedelman.org
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dow Jones Confirms Copies were Unauthorized
[ link to this | view in chronology ]