The Government Is Even Inefficient In Building Search Engines

from the who-needs-user-interface-design? dept

A few weeks ago we wrote about how Medicare was now letting recipients comparison shop for pharmacies online. The system would let them put in info about where they were and what drugs they had been prescribed and get info. When it launched, there we a bunch of problems as people noticed that the supposed "discount" they got was no discount at all. Meanwhile, a new article points out that the way they handle the user interface for this comparison shopping engine probably makes it useless to many users. Users have to go through a series of pages answering unnecessary questions before they can actually search - and the results are presented in a complex and difficult to read grid. The writer suggests that they take a lesson from the travel booking websites like Orbitz or Travelocity, and set up a quick form for search and easy to read, easy to understand results. The spokesperson from Medicare had a typical government response, instead, saying that if they can't understand the site they should just call Medicare to get the info. Of course, it sounds like there are a lot of people who can't navigate the site and are doing just that, because the spokesperson immediately pointed out that people should call in the evenings since the phonelines are overwhelmed right now.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 17 May 2004 @ 12:26pm

    600. for a toilet seat anyone ?

    our government could never be inefficient at anything.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    NOBODY, 17 May 2004 @ 2:45pm

    No Subject Given

    It's not really the government that's at fault. It's the lowest bidder. When are they going to understand as many state governments already have, that the lowest bidder isn't always the best bid. Ldiots

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    dorpus, 17 May 2004 @ 3:46pm

    What if government was good?

    Wouldn't private sector types be whining about how government is using "unfair advantage" to drive private sector companies out of business?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Jon Rubin, 18 May 2004 @ 10:10am

    The government can't make a good search tool?

    Weren't both Inktomi's and Google's development subsidized by federal grants?

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.