Google Typo Leads To Speculation About 1 Terabyte Of Gmail Storage
from the rumors-swirling dept
Someone submitted a note to Techdirt Tuesday afternoon noting that their Gmail account usage bar at the bottom of the page showed the limit to be 1000000 MB (approximately 1 terabyte) rather than the advertised 1 gigabyte (though, actually that reminds me of an annoying aside: Google keeps claiming 1 gigabyte of storage, but 1 gigabyte is actually 1024 MB and not the 1000 MB they show, which even Google will tell you). I checked my own Gmail account, and indeed, it showed the approaching terabyte level of storage. A quick note to a friend at Google confirmed the obvious: it was a mistake. However, that hasn't stopped rampant speculation to run around the internet - to the point that even News.com(.com) has written an article about it. Also, one juicy rumor about the fix: before they fix this error, they're making sure that no one actually has gone over the gigabyte storage level. Update: It's really amazing just how many people have naturally assumed that Google must have raised the storage levels to one terabyte. Meanwhile, back in the real world, Google has officially stated that this is a bug. The service will offer 1 gig, as promised. Update 2: Funny to see News.com rewriting history. The article has been changed to reflect the fact that this was just a glitch - but the article doesn't admit that News.com first reported it as if it weren't.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
1 Gigabyte **is** 1000MB!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 1 Gigabyte **is** 1000MB!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
http://www.gmailswap.com
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 1 Gigabyte **is** 1000MB!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 1 Gigabyte **is** 1000MB!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 1 Gigabyte **is** 1000MB!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 1 Gigabyte **is** 1000MB!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
aspectual
1 GB = 2^10 MB
1b GB = 10000000000b GB
Thats very ugly:
1000 MB = 1111101000b GiB
[ link to this | view in thread ]
a typo
1 GB = 2^10 MB
1b GB = 10000000000b MB
Thats very ugly, avoid at all cost.
1000 MB = 1111101000b GiB
[ link to this | view in thread ]
arbitrary
[ link to this | view in thread ]
G-Mail
I have been trying to find out more information about G-mail. I am a software test engineer in Seattle Washington and am very interested in participating in the 'beta'. However, I can not find any information as to how one can get involved, nor did I know about this prior to there 4/1 announcement. If you have any information I would really appreciate it.
Thank you,
Jeff
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 1 Gigabyte **is** 1000MB!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 1 Gigabyte **is** 1000MB!!
except in computers. so you argue that decades of incorrect usage should not be argued with. well, i point to millenia of when people argued that the earth was flat. we should not believe otherwise, simply because chronologically speaking, it is the established norm.
who cares that the earth has been proven round?
for that matter, who cares that "kilo" means "one thousand," and not "one thousand, twenty-four?"
those of us "revisionists" tired of all the bullshit and misrepresentation, that's who.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: G-Mail
http://www.gmailswap.com/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 1 Gigabyte **is** 1000MB!!
2 to the x to get each level
2^1 = 2 (1 bit)
2^3 = 8 (1 byte)
etc etc
the bs about kilobyte is 1000 is wrong wrong wrong take one computer class and you will learn the truth in the mean time i think it may be time for me to get a life and for the marketing folks to stop stealing my storage then lying about what size is
i.e. i am 5 ft 8 not 5 ft
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Terabyte Glitch
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Terabyte Glitch
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Terabyte Glitch
[ link to this | view in thread ]
1KB = 2**10,
1MB = 2**20
1GB = 2**30
1TB = 2**40
Do we notice a pattern here? The choice wasn't made arbitrarily, but based on how to keep it in an increment of 10, like metric, while at the same time using powers of two which happens to be necessary when dealing with binary. Of course, they could have used computers with circuitry that depended on 10 voltage levels instead of 2,
which was actually attempted in an effort to stay with the decimal system, but that would have been more complicated and more difficult to maintain than remembering that things were measusred in 2**10n increments.
As for the argument about drives having been first, yadda, yadda: The first computers DID NOT use hard drives but DID have a special temporary storage medium known as CACHE.. 64K, 640K, etc. to be exact. It just so happens that this representation of K really did mean 1024 bytes. So, the definition was there long before drive manufactures came about. As a matter of fact, if you look at a 1.44 MB floppy disk, you will see that it is exactly 1.44 * 1000 * 1024 bytes or 1440 KB... wasn't that nice of them to mix the definitions? But, we know that they just wanted to look like their drives were 2.4% bigger than they were. They were thinking, "How many people really notice that 35Kb of space is missing?" Problem is today people are missing several GB... Someone buys a 500GB disk today, and suddenly they are 11GB short. The 11GB would be nice... I could use it for backups of the OS partition. It still bothers me when I buy a drive because I know that I'm not really getting what I paid for.
Thanks,
Angry anonymous user.
[ link to this | view in thread ]