BT To Block Child Porn - But Who Makes The List?

from the some-questions-to-ask... dept

Lots of folks are talking about the decision by BT to block access to child porn and how this is the "first mass censorship of the web attempted in a Western democracy." Actually, that's not true at all. Pennsylvania has been forcing ISPs to do this for years. While most of the Guardian article above focuses on how it's now technically feasible to do so, it doesn't really get into the reasons why this is problematic. First, it's unclear who gets to make up the list, and how they decide what's "bad" and what's acceptable. The article mentions a list, but it's not clear that's the list that BT will use - or if there's any kind of appeal procedure for sites that have been unfairly blocked. It's also not clear if (as in Pennsylvania) blocking a site that's on a shared server will mean every other site on that server will also get blocked. The article talks up how this was an idea by NCH, the children's charity who has a habit of putting out very biased and very misleading studies trying to blame child porn on everyone but the people actually creating and hosting the child porn. This is yet another effort by them to try to hide away the problem, rather than dealing with its root causes.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    acb, 7 Jun 2004 @ 3:27am

    The thin edge of the wedge

    Once the infrastructure for blocking child porn sites is there, it will invariably be used for blocking other things. For example, Britain has legislation (i.e., the Official Secrets Act) allowing stories in news media to be censored by the state; in the age of the net, Britons could find these things on overseas websites, though this hole could now be plugged. And how long until the BPI, Britain's RIAA, demands that foreign MP3 sites are blocked?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Jun 2004 @ 5:57am

    Re: The thin edge of the wedge

    I think most of them imply first major national government....

    States do lots of stupid things...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    data64, 7 Jun 2004 @ 6:21am

    If some sites make it past the filter...

    So, do British citizens get to sue somebody if some questionable sites make it past the filter ?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Jun 2004 @ 5:03pm

    Huh?

    Child porn is illegal, yes? So if they know where it is to block it, why don't they track the people down and arrest them?

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.