Scam Check Gets Woman Sued
from the follow-the-story dept
I have to admit that I was quite confused by this account in the Washington Times of a woman who "won" a $13,000 check in an online contest, but is now being sued by her credit union because the check bounced. That's basically all of the details the story gives, but if you dig a bit deeper into the details of the story it turns out to be much more complex. The woman does apparently play a lot of internet sweepstakes related things, but that doesn't appear to be where this money came from. Instead, it came from a popular update on the traditional 419 scam. In this case a scammer offers to send the sucker a check for a certain amount of money. The sucker is then supposed to wait five days until the check clears, and then pass on most of the money to another account. It's only after this that it's determined the check is really counterfeit and the victim is left holding the bag. So, in this case, the woman received the check for $13,000, but said she believed it was a scam all along, and was shocked when she actually got it (in fact, it sounds like the check was a shift in strategies after the scammers first tried to phish her social security number and bank account info out of her -- which she refused to do). She went and asked the credit union in question, the local police, and the Better Business Bureau to get advice on what to do with it, assuming it was fake. They all told her that if it was a cashier's check, then it was real. The credit union explained the waiting period, and she followed all their rules to the letter. Then, once she was told the check was good, she withdrew most of the money and spent it on a variety of things rather than sending it to the scammers - believing she had tricked them instead. She went back to the credit union a few days later by which point they had been informed the check was fake. When they said something about calling the police, the woman freaked out and ran out of the credit union. Now, they're suing her for the money she spent. The woman is obviously not the most sophisticated internet user, but she certainly did do her best to find out if the check were counterfeit before spending any of the money. Realistically, the problem here is with the system that "clears" a check before it's been determined as counterfeit.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
similar and not new
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: similar and not new
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
no definitive waiting period
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: no definitive waiting period
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Karma Chameleon
Glad to see the no good lyin' slut slammed for trying to be a part of the whole scam in the first fucking place. The dumb twat has no business involving herself in something illegal and unethical no matter what Mike's perceived good intentions of this cunt's are.
Karma bit her in the ass and got a mouthful.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Karma Chameleon
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: no definitive waiting period
[ link to this | view in chronology ]